Humane Society International


HSI

The situation for dogs and cats varies from culture to culture. In many places in the world, these companion animals are beloved family members, living in homes or yards or allowed to roam the streets. Despite their status, they may lack essential veterinary care, such as spay/neuter, vaccines and other treatments. In other regions, dogs and cats live on the streets and are considered community animals, cared for to some extent by members of the community. But these animals, too, often lack veterinary care. Some communities may dislike, or even fear, the dogs and cats living on the streets, leaving them to seek the most basic needs of food and shelter for themselves. Sometimes dogs are kept to guard property and cats to control pests but are unlikely to receive veterinary care or concern for their welfare. Regardless of their situation, the lives of both species are filled with misery in many parts of the world.

Challenges

Whether they are unowned street animals, community animals or pets, dogs and cats worldwide face challenges to their welfare:

  • Animals on the streets often face starvation, abuse, injuries, illness and even death.
  • Dogs are responsible for most cases of rabies transmission to humans, and both dogs and cats can spread a host of other diseases.
  • Anywhere dogs and people coexist, particularly in densely packed urban areas, there is the risk of dog bites and road accidents caused by roaming animals.
  • In many communities there is an economic toll to street animals, such as expensive human rabies post-exposure treatment and negative consequences for tourism.
  • Governments, which are responsible for safeguarding public health and safety, often lack the resources and/or knowledge to develop and implement humane and effective programs to manage roaming dog and cat populations, and to tackle the associated public health issues. This lack of information and resources has led many governments to resort to cruel and ineffective means of population control, such as mass sheltering, poisoning, electrocution and shooting.
  • Most veterinarians do not have training opportunities to develop skills in high-quality spay/neuter surgery to avoid unnecessary pain, suffering or death.
  • Some families and individuals lack an understanding of the welfare needs of pets and roaming animals in their community, resulting in neglect and other forms of maltreatment.
  • Adoption of homeless dogs and cats is still a relatively new concept in many countries. And, unfortunately, even in places where adoption is common, there are not enough homes available to keep up with the number of litters born.

Opportunities

Studies by Humane Society International and others show that in some countries, such as Chile, Bolivia and Mauritius, most roaming dogs are, in fact, owned. It is estimated that 35%-40% of the global population of dogs is allowed to roam without supervision. Similar studies show that dogs considered unowned are regularly given food by one or more individuals in a community or have ready access to food and water given their proximity to humans. Since the dog population size in any community is mainly dependent on the actions of humans, such as providing food and attention, we can improve animal welfare by creating opportunities for humans to behave positively toward animals in their community. Pet care education, community engagement and empowerment, training opportunities and accessible and affordable veterinary services are part of a holistic and humane approach to dog and cat population management.

Our work

Over the past 25 years, Humane Society International (HSI) has been developing culturally sensitive approaches to improving the welfare of dogs and cats, effectively and sustainably. We provide guidance to governments at all levels, local organizations, universities and veterinarians on ways to address the root causes of animal-human conflict and animal suffering.

The goals of our companion animal welfare programs are to:

  • Provide access to affordable, high-quality veterinary services, including spay/neuter.
  • Promote humane treatment of roaming dogs and cats; in particular, end the use of cruel and lethal management techniques.
  • Strengthen and support the skills and capacity of local veterinarians to address dog and cat population management and welfare.
  • Encourage positive human-dog interactions by fostering community engagement efforts to change human attitudes and behavior toward community and family animals.
  • Establish sustainable programs by training and empowering local stakeholders to adopt and run these programs as their own.

To achieve these goals HSI promotes an evidence-based, humane and tailored solution that includes community engagement, sterilization, vaccination, education, monitoring and evaluation, advocacy, legislation, and well-run temporary holding facilities and adoption programs.

Together, these components provide the only scientific, effective and humane approach to improve dog and cat welfare in the long term.

Ways we help

The specifics of what we do are tailored to a location’s unique situation. The broad outline of our approach, after an initial assessment of needs has been completed, may include:

  • Conducting outreach and establishing partnerships with municipalities, national authorities and local communities and animal welfare/protection organizations.
  • Implementing monitoring and evaluation to establish baselines, measure progress and assess impact.
  • Initiating or expanding existing sterilization programs.
  • Initiating or expanding existing rabies eradication programs.
  • Deploying mobile veterinary clinics to rural and underserved communities to provide affordable access to preventive and primary veterinary care.
  • Providing training for local veterinarians, technicians and students in high-quality spay/neuter procedures.
  • Training dog-handling personnel and community volunteers in humane dog and cat catching and handling techniques.
  • Training teachers in Humane Education principles and lessons to integrate into their course curricula, focused on responsible pet ownership, how to prevent dog bites and compassionate treatment of animals.
  • Empowering communities to be more engaged in understanding and caring for the welfare needs of the dogs and cats in their neighborhoods.
  • Encouraging a culture of adoption.
  • Intervening when governments take inhumane action against roaming animals.
  • Assisting with the development, implementation and evaluation of successful programs and planning sustainable transitions to local stakeholders.

Other ways HSI helps dogs and cats

HSI assists governments in disaster preparedness and provides relief to animals in need, including dogs and cats, after disasters occur. We assist in the passage of laws and regulations to protect these animals. We also campaign against the dog and cat meat trade in parts of Asia. Our reach extends beyond the countries in which we have hands-on programs. HSI’s Veterinary Training Program in Latin America works with governments, universities and independent veterinarians to strengthen skills in high-quality spay/neuter surgery. The Humane Society of the United States and HSI organize Animal Care Expo, a conference offering attendees an opportunity to learn from experts in the field of dog and cat welfare and population management.

Where we work

HSI currently supports companion animal welfare efforts across Asia, Africa, Europe and the Americas. Through collaboration with local charities and government partners, HSI leads the way in humanely managing dog and cat populations through high-quality spay and neuter programs, improving veterinary training, and ensuring dogs and cats have access to veterinary care in under-served communities to create a more harmonious, safe and compassionate coexistence between people and animals.

Humane Society International


  • Sign the pledge today to save a life.

Opposition to commercial seal hunting is gaining momentum around the world, and governments, including the European Union, are increasingly taking action to end the trade in products of this brutality.

Meanwhile, each year, the EU buys hundreds of millions of euros worth of seafood caught by Canadian fishermen who either directly participate in the annual commercial slaughter of seal pups or lend their support to the killing.

Now, we are calling for a Europe-wide boycott of Canadian seafood because Europe is a major market for Canadian seafood.

Connection with commercial fisheries

Commercial seal slaughter is an off-season activity mostly conducted over just a few days by a few thousand fishermen from Canada’s east coast. Out of a population of more than 30 million people, 5,000 to 6,000 Canadians participate in the commercial seal hunt each year. On average, the fishermen who take part in sealing earn only a tiny fraction of their annual incomes from it.

The connection between commercial fisheries and the seal slaughter, and the economics of both industries, makes a boycott of Canadian seafood products an effective point of pressure for ending the killing.

Boycott goes from strength to strength

Since 2005, more than 650,000 individuals and more than 5,500 restaurants and grocery stores in the U.S.Canada and Europe have joined the ProtectSeals campaign in boycotting Canadian seafood. A number of well-known chefs [PDF] have also signed on.

They are making clear to Canada’s fishing industry that there are certain practices that are simply inconsistent with responsible, humane marine stewardship and that the commercial seal hunt is one of them. Until Canada’s fishing industry rises to a higher level of compassionate marine stewardship by giving up its support for and engagement in the commercial seal hunt, thousands of socially conscious citizens and companies are electing to shift their seafood purchasing away from it.

Help end the slaughter

European consumers and businesses that purchase Canadian seafood have the power to convince the Canadian government and individual fishermen to stop the slaughter of seals.

The Canadian government, Canada’s fishing industry, and individual sealers face an important economic decision. Until Canada’s commercial seal hunt is ended for good, the ProtectSeals network will continue and expand the boycott of Canadian seafood products.

Canada’s annual commercial seal hunt is the largest slaughter of marine mammals on the planet.  Now is the time to send a message to Canada that this hunt needs to be ended once and for all. Learn more about the slaughter and why it is so cruel—and then sign the pledge today [for individuals /for chefs and businesses [PDF]] to help us finally stop this needless suffering.

Humane Society International


  • We will boycott Canadian seafood until the slaughter ends. Katie Carrus/The HSUS

HSI is calling on individuals and businesses to boycott Canadian seafood until the Canadian commercial seal slaughter ends.

Patrons

If your favourite chef, restaurant or food retailer isn’t yet supporting the boycott, why not print off our Chefs & Businesses Pledge [PDF], take it with you on your next visit and encourage them to sign up? Together, we can stop the slaughter forever.

Chef, restauranteur or food retailer?

Get involved and help the campaign—complete and return the Chefs & Businesses Pledge [PDF] to show your support for the seals today!

Restaurants supporting the boycott in Europe

We are delighted to announce that the following restaurants have signed our pledge to boycott Canadian seafood (click on each country to view a list):

Belgium
Czech Republic
France
Ireland
The Netherlands
United Kingdom 

Also, find out more about the thousands of restaurants, grocery stores and individuals supporting the boycott in the United States and Canada.

Supporting organisations in Europe

We are grateful to the following organisations for their support and assistance with the boycott campaign in Europe. Click on their logos to find out more about them.

     
     

 

Restaurants in Belgium

Anderlecht
Brasserie Restaurant La Paix 1892

Antwerpen
Yeliste

Brasschaat
‘T Klokkenhof 

Brussels
Bonsoir Clara
Comme Chez Soi
Hakkapy sprl
La Roue D’Or
La Truffe Noire
L’Ecailler du Palais Royal

Deurne
BVBA Bar-Choc

Dottignies
La Chaumière de l’E3

Etterbeek
Globe-Halles 

Ganshoren
Le Frederiksborg 
Restaurant Bruneau  

Genk
DC Horeca

Gent
Passion

Grace-Hollogne
V.H. Taverne

Hasselt
De Goei Goesting

Herve
Quai Des Champs

Hove

Blue’Zt

Huizingen
Kart-Invest
 
Lasne
Fresh Attitide

Lochristi
L’Eau De Lo

Marche-En-Famenne
N.A.K. 

Nijlen
BVBA Nilania

Oupeye
Clb-Restauration.be

Overijse
Barbizon

Quaregnon
Le Menu Plaisir 

Rixensart
Autre Chose

Tongeren
Taurasi

Uccle
Bon Bon!

Villers-l-Bouillet
Houpco

Restaurants in Czech Republic

Prague
7 Angels – U Sedmi Andelu 
Cafe Sahara
Cerny´ Orel 
Da Nico 
Diana
Hotel Pod Vezi 
Kampa 14

Restaurants in France

Paris
Nabulione
Planbio Soup & Smoothie
Racine
Vert Midi
Zuzu’s Petals

Rumilly
Tounatur

Restaurants in Ireland

Dublin
64 Wine
Alexis Bar and Grill
Balzac at La Stampa Hotel & Spa
Bang Café
Bijou
Café Novo at The Westbury Hotel
Carravagio’s in O’Callaghan’s Alexander Hotel
Caviston’s
Cellar Restaurant
Dali’s, Blackrock
dylan restaurant
Fillies Cafe and Bar
Fitzpatricks-Killiney Castle
Goldsmith’s Restaurant in O’Callaghan’s Mont Clare Hotel
hartley’s, Dun Laoghaire
Il Posto
Il Segreto
Lanyon’s Restaurant in O’Callaghan’s Davenport Hotel
Le Mere Zou
L’Officina (Dunne & Crescenzi)
Mantra
No. 1 Marrion Street Bar in O’Callaghan’s Mont Clare Hotel
Peploe’s
President’s Bar in O’Callaghan’s Davenport Hotel
Restaurant Patrick Guilbaud
Roly’s Bistro
Still Restaurant
The Gallery at The Westbury Hotel
Town Bar & Grill
Unicorn
Venu Brasserie
Wilde – The Restaurant
Winner’s Bar in O’Callaghan’s Alexander Hotel

Restaurants in The Netherlands

Amsterdam
Beddington’s
Indonesisch Restaurant Orient
Visrestaurant Lucius

Restaurants in United Kingdom

London
The Ledbury
The Square
Tom Aikens Restaurant
Tom’s Kitchen

Wiltons

Humane Society International


  • We are working to end bullfighting. HSI

Mexico is one of the few remaining countries where bullfighting is still legal (others include Spain, France, Portugal, Colombia, Venezuela, Peru, and Ecuador). The largest bullfighting ring in the world, fitting 60,000 spectators, resides in Mexico City. There are approximately 225 bullrings in Mexico, in both large cities and small towns. Only Spain exceeds Mexico in the number of bullfights per year.

An agonizing death

The object of bullfighting is for the bullfighter (matador) to “conquer and kill the bull with a swift clean kill by placing a sword in a coin-sized area between the bull’s shoulders.” [1] Advocates of bullfighting argue that if the matador aims correctly, the animal dies in a matter of seconds. This type of quick, clean death, however, is not the norm. In most cases, the matador misses the target, injuring the bull’s lungs and bronchial tubes, causing blood to flow and bubble through the animal’s mouth and nose.

Bullfighting is “a cruel tradition, where the victim first off is innocent and where it is savagely tortured and massacred, as a tradition it is ethically inconceivable.”

In every bullfight, or “corrida de toros”, four to six bulls are killed. Each bullfight is split into three “tercios,” or thirds, with two bullfights per session, each lasting about 20 minutes.

Expert opinion

According to ex-matador D. Alvaro Múnera, bullfighting is “una tradición cruel, donde la víctima primero es inocente y donde es salvajemente torturada y masacrada, como tradición éticamente es inconcebible [a cruel tradition, where the victim first off is innocent and where it is savagely tortured and massacred, as a tradition it is ethically inconceivable].” [2]

Zoologist Jordi Casamitjana agrees, stating that “all behavioural evidence shows that bulls and cows suffer in bullfights; yes, they do suffer in all types of bullfights, even in those that do not end with their deaths; and yes, all aspects of any bullfight, from the transport to the death, are in themselves causes of suffering.” [3]

In Mexico, children as young as six may begin training for a career in this bloody “sport” [4].


 

¹Brook B. 2004.  The Real Mexico.  Mexico’s Dance with death. http://www.therealmexico.com/bullfighting.htm.  Accessed July 11, 2008.

²Fraile, Julio Ortega.  OtroMadrid.org.  Entrevista a D. Alvaro Múnera, de Torero a Luchador Contra la Tortura.  http://www.otromadrid.org/articulo/5837/entrevista-alvaro-munera-torero/.  Accessed July 16, 2008.

³Casamitjana, Jordi.  ‘Suffering’ in bullfighting bulls; An ethologist’s perspective. http://www.ffw.ch/files/Corrida%202008/eng_jordi_casamitjana.pdf.  Accessed July 14, 2008.

4Kocherga, Angela.  2008.  Child bullfighters face death in the ring.  http://www.khou.com/topstories/stories/khou080219_tnt_kidbullfighters.a5d1337.html.  Accessed July 16, 2008.

The Canadian commercial seal hunt is responsible for the cruel deaths of hundreds of thousands of baby seals each year

Humane Society International


Canada’s annual commercial seal hunt is the largest slaughter of marine mammals on the planet. Facing harsh criticism the world over because of the hunt’s cruelty and unsustainability, the Canadian government and fishing industry have spread much misinformation. Here are the basic facts about the hunt.

Q: Which seals are targeted by Canada’s seal hunt?

A: Harp seals are the primary target of the commercial seal hunt, and to a much smaller extent, hooded seals are also killed. Fully 97 percent of the harp seals killed are pups under just three months of age.

Q: Where are the seals killed?

A: Canada’s commercial seal hunt occurs on the ice floes off Canada’s East Coast in two areas: the Gulf of St. Lawrence (west of Newfoundland and east of the Magdalen Islands) and the “Front” (northeast of Newfoundland).

Q: Who kills seals and why?

A: Sealing is an off-season activity conducted by fishermen from Canada’s East Coast. They make, on average, a small fraction of their annual incomes from sealing—and the rest from commercial fisheries. Even in Newfoundland, where most sealers live, the government estimates there are less than 6,000 fishermen who actively participate in the seal hunt each year—less than one percent of the provincial population.

Q: How are the seals killed?

A: The Canadian Marine Mammal Regulations that govern the hunt stipulate sealers may kill seals with wooden clubs, hakapiks (large, ice-pick-like clubs) and guns. In the Gulf of St. Lawrence, clubs and hakapiks are the killing implements of choice, and in the Front, guns are more widely used (though clubs are frequently used at the Front to kill seals who have been shot and wounded).

It is important to note that each killing method is demonstrably cruel. Because sealers shoot at seals from moving boats, the pups are often only wounded. The main sealskin processing plant in Canada deducts $2 from the price they pay for the skins for each bullet hole they find; therefore, sealers are loath to shoot seals more than once. As a result, wounded seals are often left to suffer in agony.

Q: Is the seal hunt cruel?

A: Yes. It is notable that in the 50 years Canada’s commercial seal hunt has been the subject of consistent veterinary scrutiny, not one report has ever suggested the seal hunt is acceptably humane. A 2007 review by Dr. Mary Richardson, a Canadian veterinary expert in humane slaughter methods, concluded that the commercial seal hunt is inherently inhumane because of the environment in which it operates and the speed at which the killing must be conducted. Also in 2007, a report by an international team of veterinary and zoology experts who studied the hunt concluded that both clubbing and shooting of seals in Canada are inhumane and should be prohibited. The report noted a general failure to comply with regulations by sealers and a failure to enforce the regulations by authorities.

Similarly, in 2001, a report by an independent team of veterinarians who studied the hunt concluded that governmental regulations regarding humane killing were neither being respected nor enforced, and that the seal hunt failed to comply with Canada’s basic animal welfare standards. Shockingly, the veterinarians found that in 42 percent of the cases they studied, there was not enough evidence of cranial injury to even guarantee unconsciousness at the time of skinning.

Parliamentarians, journalists, and scientists who observe Canada’s commercial seal hunt each year continue to report unacceptable levels of cruelty, including sealers dragging conscious seals across the ice floes with boat hooks, shooting seals and leaving them to suffer in agony, stockpiling dead and dying animals, and cutting open live seals.

Q: How many seals are killed each year?

A: In recent years, hundreds of thousands of seals have been killed annually in the commercial seal hunt. These kill levels are among the highest witnessed in Canada in half a century. The last time seals were killed at this rate—in the 1950s and ’60s—the harp seal population was reduced by as much as two thirds.

Moreover, the actual number of seals killed is likely higher than the number reported. Many seals are shot at and injured in the course of the hunt, and studies suggest that a significant number of these animals slip beneath the surface of the water, where they die slowly and are never recovered.

Q: Are there any penalties when hunters exceed the government’s quota?

A: No. In 2002, the Canadian government knowingly allowed sealers to exceed the quota by more than 37,000 animals. Sealers had already killed substantially more than the quota allowed by May 15 (the regulated closing date of the seal hunt), and yet the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans chose to extend the sealing season until June. In 2004, sealers killed close to 16,000 seals more than the permitted quota. Again, the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans extended the sealing season until well into June.

Q: What products are made from seals?

A: Seals are killed primarily for their fur, which is used to produce fashion garments and other items. There is a small market for seal oil (both for industrial purposes and for human consumption), and seal penises have been sold in Asian markets as an aphrodisiac. There is almost no market for the meat, so seal carcasses are normally left to rot on the ice. Senior Canadian government representatives define the seal slaughter as “primarily a fur hunt.”

Q: Is the seal hunt economically important?

A: Sealing is an off-season activity conducted by fishermen from Canada’s East Coast. They make, on average, one twentieth of their incomes from seal hunting and the rest from commercial fisheries. Even in Newfoundland, where most sealers live, income from the hunt accounts for less than one percent of the province’s economy and less than two percent of the landed value of the fishery. According to the Newfoundland government, out of a population of half a million people, fewer than 6,000 fishermen participate in the seal hunt each year.

The Canadian government could easily shut down the seal hunt and replace it with economic alternatives should it choose to do so. One solution, which is supported by both animal protection groups and sealers, is a federal buyout of the commercial sealing industry. This program would involve the federal government’s “buying back” sealing licenses from fishermen—compensating them for lost revenue in the wake of the closure of the slaughter. Such a plan would be coupled with an investment in developing economic alternatives for the communities affected.

Fishing industry buyouts are nothing new to the Canadian government—more than $4 billion has been spent on Canada’s East Coast on buyouts and alternative economic development plans in recent years.  When Canada ended its commercial whale hunt, it compensated whale hunters for their licenses in a similar fashion.  One potential industry for the federal government to develop in place of seal hunting is marine ecotourism, including seal watching. In the Magdalen Islands, one of Canada’s sealing areas, seal watching now brings in more money to local communities than seal hunting does.

Q: Does the government subsidize the hunt?

A: Yes. According to reports from the Canadian Institute for Business and the Environment, more than $20 million in subsidies were provided to the sealing industry between 1995 and 2001. Those subsidies came from entities such as the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency, Human Resources Development Council, and Canada Economic Development–Quebec. These subsidies take a variety of forms, including funding the salaries for seal processing plant workers, market research and development trips, and capital acquisitions for processing plants. In 2004, more than $400,000 was provided by the Canadian government to companies for the development of seal products.

In recent years, millions of dollars have been spent on icebreaking for the sealing vessels and search and rescue of sealing crews by the Canadian Coast Guard—all at taxpayers’ expense. In 2009, the Canadian government estimated that enforcement of the Marine Mammal Regulations cost between $1.8 and $3.6 million—for an industry that brought in less than $1.5 million that year. The Canadian government also commits considerable resources each year to lobbying foreign governments on behalf of the sealing industry, including overseas flights and accommodations for lobbyists.

Moreover, Canada’s commercial seal hunt is also indirectly subsidized by the Norwegian government. A Norwegian company purchases close to 80 percent of the sealskins produced in Canada in any given year through its Canadian subsidiary. These skins are shipped in an unprocessed state directly to Norway, where they are tanned and re-exported. The Norwegian government provides significant financial assistance to this company each year.

Q: Is it true seals are jeopardizing the Canadian cod fishery?

A: There is no evidence to support this contention. Some fishing industry lobby groups try to claim that seals must be culled to protect fish stocks, but nothing could be further from the truth.

The scientific community agrees that the true cause of the depletion of fish stocks off Canada’s East Coast is human over-fishing. Blaming seals for disappearing fish is a convenient way for the fishing industry to divert attention from its irresponsible and environmentally destructive practices that continue today.

In truth, seals, like all marine mammals, are a vital part of the ecosystem of the Northwest Atlantic. Harp seals, which are the primary target of the hunt, are opportunistic feeders, meaning they eat many different species. So while approximately three percent of a harp seal’s diet may be commercially fished cod, harp seals also eat many significant predators of cod, such as squid. That is why some scientists are concerned that culling harp seals could further inhibit recovery of commercially valuable fish stocks in the Northwest Atlantic.

Q: Are seals overpopulated?

A: No.

While the harp seal population in the Northwest Atlantic is the world’s largest, it is a migratory population that spans the distance between Canada and Greenland, and is supposed to number in the many millions.

In the 1950s and ’60s, over-hunting reduced the harp seal population by as much as two thirds. By the early 1970s, senior Canadian government scientists were warning that the population could be lost altogether if commercial sealing was not suspended for at least a decade.

In the early 1980s, the European Union banned the import of whitecoat seal skins, effectively removing the principal market for the hunt at the time. For the next decade, the numbers of seals killed in the hunt dramatically declined, and the harp seal population began to recover.

But in the 1990s, the Canadian government rejuvenated the commercial seal hunt through massive subsidies. And with hundreds of thousands of seal pups killed in the past five years alone, we can only wonder what the impact will be on the harp seal population in coming years. Scientists have already sounded the alarm regarding the poor science used by the Canadian government to set hunt quotas.

Humane Society International


  • Before the killing begins. HSI

With hundreds of thousands of seals clubbed and shot to death for their fur in most years, Canada’s commercial seal hunt is the largest slaughter of marine mammals on Earth. Almost all of the seals killed are defenceless pups, and they are beaten and shot to death for their fur.

In 2005, the Protect Seals network launched a boycott of Canadian seafood until the slaughter ends. Each year, the boycott has grown, and now, we are calling for Europeans to join because Europe is a major market for Canadian seafood—with exports contributing €250 million annually to the Canadian economy. The connection between the commercial fishing industry and the seal hunt gives consumers the world over the power to end this cruel slaughter of baby seals forever.

Take action

Chef or restaurant owner?

Learn more

The largest slaughter of marine mammals on Earth

Humane Society International


  • We must save them. HSI

  • Looking back. HSI

  • Grey seal mother and pup. HSI

  • Thin ice means mass pup mortality. HSI

  • On the hunt. HSI

  • Senseless cruelty. HSI

  • Dragged back to the boat. HSI

With hundreds of thousands of seals clubbed and shot to death for their fur in most years, Canada’s commercial seal hunt is the largest slaughter of marine mammals on Earth. It is also the most brutal.

It’s a cruel slaughter of baby seals

Canadian government statistics confirm more than 97 percent of the seals killed in the past five years have been babies less than three months of age, and the majority has been just one month old or less. At the time of slaughter, many of these pups have not yet eaten their first solid meal or taken their first swim, leaving them utterly defenseless against the sealers. The baby seals are killed for their fur and their carcasses are routinely left to rot on the ice. HSI video evidence shows wounded baby seals left to suffer in agony, conscious seals pup sliced open or impaled on metal hooks and dragged across the ice, and seals killed with illegal weapons. Our footage has prompted governments around the world to take action to ban their trades in seal products, and Canadian veterinary experts to call the seal hunt “inherently inhumane” [PDF].

How your donations are helping to save seals

It threatens seal populations

Independent scientists have condemned the current Canadian seal hunt management plan as reckless and irresponsible, stating that it poses a threat to the survival of seal populations. Notably, today’s seal kill levels meet and exceed those of a half century ago, when sealers quickly reduced the harp seal population by as much as two thirds. Harp seals now face an added threat to their existence, as climate change causes their sea ice habitat to diminish at an alarming rate. In recent years, the Canadian government has estimated up to 100 percent mortality for seal pups born in key whelping areas, when the sea ice melted before they were old enough to survive in open water.

Most Canadians oppose it

Polling consistently shows the overwhelming majority of Canadians oppose the seal slaughter and their tax dollars being used to promote it. Notably, even in Newfoundland, where the vast majority of sealers live, 80 percent of residents believe that the seal pups that comprise virtually all of the seal slaughter should be protected, while an additional five percent believe seals should not be killed at any age.

It costs more than it brings in

Sealers are commercial fishermen who earn, on average, less than five percent of their incomes from killing seals. In recent years, the landed value of the seal hunt has been in the region of $1 million, less than one tenth of one percent of the GDP of Newfoundland. Despite its low economic returns, the Canadian government continues to invest massive subsidies in the commercial sealing industry each year. In 2001, the Canadian Institute for Business and the Environment produced a report detailing more than $20 million in government subsidies provided to the sealing industry over the previous seven years. Presently, it is estimated that Canada spends more than $4.3 million annually in Coast Guard support for the slaughter alone.

In 2005, following decades of failed negotiations with the Canadian government, The Humane Society of the United States and a network of the world’s most powerful animal protection groups launched a global boycott of Canadian seafood products until the seal slaughter is ended for good. Since the boycott began, thousands of businesses and hundreds of thousands of individuals have pledged to avoid some or all Canadian seafood until the seal hunt has ended. Canada is now attempting to negotiate a free trade deal with the European Union reportedly worth $12 billion to Canada’s economy annually, including $36 million for the Canadian fishing industry. At the same time, Canada has launched an aggressive attack on European values and democratic processes, launching a WTO challenge in response to the EU ban on seal product trade. Government reports suggest that the seal issue could negatively impact ratification of the deal by the European Parliament.

It could easily be ended

HSI Canada believes the Canadian government should end the commercial seal slaughter by implementing a one-time buyout of the commercial sealing industry. This cost-effective solution would compensate fishermen for any lost revenue as the seal hunt is closed, and it would provide a graceful way for Canada to move beyond commercial sealing. Notably, a 2010 poll by Ipsos Reid found that half of Newfoundland sealers holding an opinion already support this plan.

To learn more, please visit our Seal Slaughter Q&A and Protect Seals Resources pages.

Humane Society International


  • Two young tigers. Captive Animals’ Protection Society

The number of circuses touring with wild animal acts in Britain has declined significantly in recent years, from 20 in 1997 to three as of December 2011.

Among them, the three circuses are thought to use in the region of 40 wild animals, including lions, tigers, zebras, camels and various reptiles.

The last elephant to perform in a British circus, Anne, was retired to a safari park in 2010. The owners of the circus from which she came have been charged, by the Crown Prosecution Service, with causing her unnecessary suffering. The trail is set for June 2012.

Although the 2006 Animal Welfare Act covers circus animals, it is recognised that there is need for specific legislation to provide them with greater protection. A ban has the support of the public, animal welfare groups and parliament.

The British Veterninary Association (BVA) is also supportive of a move to end the use of wild animals in circuses, stating: “The welfare needs of non-domesticated, wild animals cannot be met within the environment of a travelling circus; especially in terms of accommodation and the ability to express normal behaviour.”

Protection for current and future animals

As well as protecting the animals currently involved, a ban on wild animals in circuses would also prevent more wild animals being introduced by circuses in future years.

Legislation in other countries

Public and political support for ending the use of wild animals in circuses is not new. Bans have already been successfully implemented in several countries around the world, including Austria, Croatia, Costa Rica, Denmark, Israel and Singapore.

In 2009 Bolivia banned the use of wild and domestic animals in circuses and the law is already being implemented. Similar legislation has been passed in Peru, and is working its way through the Brazilian and Chilean Congresses. In Germany, the government’s second chamber has recommended that a ban be introduced, and in early 2011 China announced a ban on the use of animals in all 300 state-owned circuses.

UK public support

In the UK, 94.5 percent of responses to a Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) public consultation carried out early in 2010 were in favour of a ban on wild animals in circuses.

Polls regularly show that the majority of the UK citizens are supportive of such a measure, and a number of local authorities do not allow circuses to stage such shows on land under their control.

There is also widespread political support for a ban.

HSI UK, alongside a number of like-minded organisations including Born Free, the Captive Animals’ Protection Society (CAPS), the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA), and Care for the Wild International, is calling on the UK government to implement legislation to ban the use of wild animals in circuses in England once and for all.

Humane Society International


For comprehensive reports on animal agribusiness and its toll on farm animal welfare, the environment, and public health, browse through our Research Library below. Each report is available online as a downloadable PDF.

Animal Agriculture Overview

Farm animal welfare

Human health implications of factory farming

Environmental implications

Economics

Brazil

India

Mexico

Humane Society International


For more than 20 years, SanWild has been rescuing orphaned, injured, neglected and abused wild animals and then, once their health is restored, releasing the animals into the large sanctuary to spend the rest of their life in settings largely free of adverse human impacts.

Each of the residents has a story that illustrates both woe and hope. Among SanWild’s thousands of inhabitants are two giraffes, Kariba and her mother Sindisa, who were saved after Sindisa was discovered caught in a poacher’s snare where she’d suffered for 10 days before being freed. Nine elephant residents were saved from certain death when the owners of the land they inhabited wanted them removed. There is also a pack of rambunctious wild dogs rescued from a deficient zoo, and two hippos rescued from a travelling circus. And a pride of 15 lions rescued from a canned hunting operation are receiving care thanks to HSI supporters.

Not only is the SanWild sanctuary dedicated to the animals in their care, but they are also an active voice against wildlife abuse in South Africa, such as the canned hunting of lions. This horrific industry, with an average of 1200 lions shot as trophies every year, continues to operate despite promises by the government to shut it down.

HSI has been working with the SanWild Wildlife Sanctuary for several years. Our Australia office has provided funding for the rehabilitation and release of 20 ex-captive Vervet monkeys into the sanctuary, and for their anti-poaching ranger program. In addition to feeding SanWild’s rescued lions, we have also worked with them to raise awareness about the canned lion hunting industry in South Africa, motivating our supporters worldwide to take action against this egregious practice.

You can help

Donate to help the animals at SanWild Wildlife Sanctuary.

Learn More Button Inserter