A model for humane street dog population control in Asia

Humane Society International


  • At the signing of the extension agreement. Aarthi Gunnupuri/HSI

  • The project has been successful. Aarthi Gunnupuri/HSI

  • Many areas are accessible only on foot. Aarthi Gunnupuri/HSI

  • A shelter our team visited houses numerous dogs. Aarthi Gunnupuri/HSI

  • Lunchtime. Aarthi Gunnupuri/HSI

  • A notched ear signifies sterilization. Aarthi Gunnupuri/HSI

  • Dr. Rowan at the shelter. Aarthi Gunnupuri/HSI

  • Three friends. Aarthi Gunnupuri/HSI

  • Tens of thousands of street dogs will have better lives. Aarthi Gunnupuri/HSI

“Finally, we can see light at the end of the tunnel,” said officiating Prime Minister and current Minister of Works and Human Settlement of Bhutan, Lyonpo Yeshey Zimba. In a meeting with Dr. Andrew Rowan, CEO of HSI, Mr. Zimba was referring to the results achieved by our spay/neuter/vaccination program for street dogs. In a span of three years, in a joint project with the Royal Government of Bhutan (RGoB), HSI vets have reached more than 50 percent of the total street dog population in Bhutan.

On the streets of Thimphu, Bhutan’s capital, the program has made a tangible difference to the locals. “There are no new additions to the gang here,” said a shop owner, pointing to a group of dogs lounging outside.

Give now to support our efforts to help street dogs in Bhutan and around the world.

Before HSI partnered with RGoB, local authorities had tried several methods to reduce the dog population. In the 1980s, a vigorous elimination program was carried out but failed to bring down numbers, as it always does. Relocating dogs was followed by impounding, with shelters constructed across the country. Despite all these efforts, conflicts between street dogs and people were worsening. After the impounding program, the animals who escaped from shelters would form packs of as many as 30 dogs each. “The only thing controlling their numbers was cars running over the puppies—what a mess!” Mr. Zimba said.

A happier, more humane approach

Now, in a few years, Bhutan may emerge as the first country in Asia to have successfully and humanely managed its street dog population. Dr. Rowan was there to sign a three-year extension of our project.

“This program is not only a long-term, sustainable and humane solution, but is also in harmony with Bhutan’s Buddhist culture and principles,” said Lyonpo Dr. Pema Gyamtsho, Minister of Agriculture, RGoB, as he signed the Memorandum of Understanding with HSI.

The small, mountainous country, between India and China, has been in the global spotlight for suggesting the Gross National Happiness index as one of the indicators to measure its citizens’ quality of life. At the signing, Dr. Rowan, who had visited a local dog shelter earlier in the day, spoke about having received his “happy pills” in the form of many doggy kisses. “When the dogs are sterilized, they’re healthier and people are happier. Although hard to document, this (a happier relationship between people and dogs), will be one of the more positive outcomes of HSI’s efforts in Bhutan,” Dr. Rowan said. He also predicted that Bhutan was going to be the landmark project in humane dog population control in Asia, and perhaps, the world. “Everyone’s going to be citing the Bhutan project. This is going to be a very important program.”

Indeed, the project has already garnered a great deal of appreciation from people inside the country and the animal welfare community around the world. Even neighboring Bangladesh and Nepal have taken note of Bhutan’s success. Almost all of the dignitaries and ministers that we met thanked the team and welcomed the extension. Among them was the Queen-Mother of Bhutan, Queen Ashi Tshering Yangdon, an avid dog lover. In her meeting with us, the Queen-Mother spoke about dogs as sentient beings, whose welfare people should no longer ignore.

Facing challenges

“Across most of mountainous Bhutan, accessibility is a problem. When we started off, our vehicles broke down every day. Eventually, we had no choice but to invest in a bigger, more rugged vehicle. Even then, many areas had to be covered by foot,” said Dr. Rajesh Pandey, HSI Project Coordinator in Bhutan, who is originally from India.

In keeping with our commitment to empowering local authorities and communities to ensure long-term sustainability of our programs, our team has been consistently working to share their expertise. Over the past three years, we have kept a dynamic ratio that slowly raises the number of local vets and talent working on the project. In 2009, when we had just begun our work in Bhutan, 90 percent of the staff comprised of HSI team members, while last year, our staff comprised of only 30 percent of the entire team. The country opened to modernization only recently, and finding qualified veterinarians was not easy. “Alongside work on the field, training and setting up a local team was also essential, but there weren’t enough vets,” Dr. Pandey said.

The way ahead

Encouraged by local officials, 28 fresh veterinarians will graduate this year and are scheduled to join the government team working on the project. Also, to ensure consistent and optimal coverage, HSI will donate operation tables, equipment and surgical supplies to spaying clinics in all the 20 dzongkhags (districts) of Bhutan.

We believe that it is very important to examine the different outcomes of the spay/neuter/vaccination program. Various parameters like the subtle shifts in the human-dog relationship, rise of community adoptions when there are fewer dogs, reduced aggression and post-operative health are being considered for documentation and research.

A study, jointly conducted by HSI and RGoB staff, towards the end of the first phase (three years), demonstrated that there was reduced aggression and also howling during mating season. In the past, the barking of street dogs was the only thing many tourists complained about regarding an otherwise wonderful experience in the country! A comparative study by the team also revealed that the treated dogs fared much better in terms of general health, including skin conditions.

In the past year, our team has already been approached with numerous research proposals based on the Bhutan project. “Of course, we’re going to work on improving the program in Bhutan, but an equally important focus area is going to be documenting the entire process and creating a guide book for other countries,” said Rahul Sehgal, director of HSI/India and a project leader. “This work is important not just for Bhutan but also for other developing countries that assume incorrectly they do not have the resources to deal with the problem in a humane manner.” It is our goal to prove them wrong. Donate now to support our efforts.

Humane Society International


by Peter Li

April 20, 2012 was a significant day for the estimated 130 million dogs in China. A weibo (Chinese twitter) alert led to a massive dog rescue on a highway in Kunming, southwest Yunnan Province.

Advocates intervene

Stopped at a toll station was a truck loaded with misery and despair. Bound for Guangxi, some 1,000 miles from its place of origin, the truck carried 475 dogs headed for dog-eating markets. On learning of this, hundreds of Kunming activists converged on the toll station to demand confiscation of the dogs. Persistence finally led to their release after hours of difficult negotiations.

A sad state

The rescued animals were in shocking condition. Dead dogs were found in many suffocating small cages. Some were barely clinging to life. Most were stoic, emaciated and dehydrated.“The crying of the dogs was such that I fought hard to suppress my emotions,” said a rescuer tearfully. “But I lost control of my feelings when I saw a dog licking every drop of water around him that he could reach.”

Donate to support our work to help dogs in China and around the world.

Many dogs had injuries. Some of them could not even stand up when moved into bigger enclosures. Despite what they had endured, most were forgiving and showed no signs of aggression toward people. In fact, many dogs seemed to have been household pets. Some wore jackets. Others wore collars. Their temperaments suggested that they had been close to humans.

Hope for the cause

Leading the rescue and post-rescue care is Haoyuner Animal Protection Center (HAPC), Kunming’s biggest animal protection group and a previous participant in an event sponsored by HSI in China. Ms. Zhao, an HAPC staff member, told HSI that the dogs would be moved to their shelter after evaluation. “We are working hard to provide the best possible care for these traumatized animals,” Zhao said. Volunteers from across the city have joined HAPC to help and the rescue operation has attracted worldwide attention.

Kunming is relatively remote, and this rescue shows that animal protection efforts are expanding into the country’s less developed inland areas. “Those young people who spent sleepless nights caring for the dogs are the hope of our country,” wrote one Web surfer.

Creating change

This incident was not without controversy. Dog-eating is not illegal in China. There are still people who see animal protection as a hobby of the rich. In fact,volunteers and activists are young and passionate, with limited means.

HSI has been following the development of the rescue operation. Our China operation team has contacted HAPC and offered funding help. We believe that the Kunming rescue sent a strong message to Chinese society to be conscious of and sensitive to the adverse moral, economic, public health and political impacts of dog abuse and dog eating.

We congratulate the Kunming activists for their success and we will continue our efforts to encourage greater awareness of animal welfare issues, support capacity building, assist in lobbying activities aimed at policy change, respond to distress calls and monitor developments as the Chinese animal protection movement grows. Give now to support our life-saving work.

Dr. Peter Li is China Policy Specialist for HSI.

Humane Society International


Every year, in oceans around the world, tens of millions of sharks are condemned to a slow and painful death from the cruel and wasteful practice of shark finning. Most of these animals are killed specifically to meet the demand for shark fin soup—often having their fins removed while they are still alive. The shark is then cast back into the water to endure a painful death from suffocation, blood loss or predation by other species.

The high price of shark fin soup

Shark fin soup is an East Asian delicacy, which is traditionally served at weddings and New Year celebrations. But as the impact behind the consumption of shark fin soup becomes clearer, many prominent members of Chinese communities are speaking out against this unnecessary dish which causes so much suffering.

Sharks are apex predators, playing an essential role in marine ecosystems. And despite common beliefs, sharks have far more reasons to fear humans than we have to fear them. This cruel and ecologically devastating practice not only endangers the very survival of sharks but also the species that rely on them.

What you can do in Canada

Several cities in Canada are leading by example, and have already passed municipal bans against the consumption, sale and possession of shark fins such as Abbotsford, Brantford, Coquitlam, Duncan, City of Langley, Township of Langley, London, Maple Ridge, Nanaimo, Newmarket, North Vancouver, Oakville, Pickering, Port Moody, and White Rock.

Choose to say no to shark fin soup. Urge the restaurants you visit to take it off the menu if they serve it. If you are planning a wedding celebration, choose an alternative dish. Many couples are now choosing not to serve shark fin soup at their celebration, instead explaining to guests that they are choosing to protect sharks and the environment.

Humane Society International


  • These events are dangerous and inhumane. Fernando Alonso Herrero/istock

by Cynthia Dent

Should an animal be afforded dignity and protection against cruelty?  In Costa Rica, the answer was a resounding “Yes,” effectively halting a proposed Pamplona-esque bull run.

Bringing bull runs to Costa Rica

At the beginning of 2012, the Spanish Chamber of Commerce joined with several private companies to try to bring “Pamplona y Más” to Costa Rica, with one of the main events featuring a bull run similar to those held at the San Fermin festivities. Traditionally, Costa Rica has had modified bull runs, where a bull is thrown into a ring with several people teasing the animal and avoiding getting hit by him.  The new proposal was meant to emulate the Pamplona bull run, with a 700-meter course, with sharp corners, through which the bulls would run.

The public reacts

Animal welfare groups and other concerned citizens protested the activity on many grounds, citing the sharp corners of the run and the inappropriate flooring.  HSI, along with several other NGOs, reacted strongly to bringing another culture’s cruelty into Costa Rica and started an aggressive campaign against the event. HSI/Latin America sent a letter to the Department of Animal Health, urging the denial of necessary permits on the grounds of poor animal welfare. The Association of Psychologists, the Association of Biologists and the Association of Veterinarians all sent out public statements renouncing the bull run, specifying similar concerns. At the same time, three organizations presented a case to the constitutional court, basing their argument on the bull run’s representing an infringement on animal welfare.

Constitutional victory

Costa Rica’s constitutional court declared the “Pamplona y Más” bull run unconstitutional, showing in a historic vote that animals should be treated with diginity and must be protected against mistreatment. Given that this is the highest constitutional court in Costa Rica, it sets an important precedent, to be celebrated.

Cynthia Dent is regional director of HSI/Latin America.

Humane Society International


  • HSI is calling on Canada to “Be Cruelty-Free”. iStock

Q: What does “cruelty-free” mean in relation to cosmetics?

A: A cruelty-free cosmetics company is one that has eliminated animal testing at all levels of production as of a “fixed cut-off date.” This must apply not only to the finished products that consumers purchase, but also to each and every raw ingredient. In order to meet its commitment to cruelty-free, a company must not sell its products in countries that require animal testing; it must not use new ingredients that would lead to new animal testing; and it must ensure that all of its ingredient suppliers commit to a policy of “no new cosmetics animal testing.”

Q: Is animal testing for cosmetics a legal requirement in Canada?

A: No. Canada’s Food and Drugs Act prohibits the sale of any cosmetic containing harmful ingredients or contaminants, but does not require that animal testing be conducted to demonstrate safety.

Q: Have any countries banned animal testing for cosmetics?

A: Yes. Animal testing for cosmetics has been banned throughout the 27 member countries of the European Union since 2009, and the sale of cosmetic products or ingredients subject to new animal testing after March 2013 is also illegal. Israel imposed similar bans in 2007 and 2013. Similar policy change is also under consideration in India and South Korea. In most other countries, cosmetics animal testing is neither expressly required nor prohibited, and therefore continues to take place at the discretion of cosmetics companies and ingredient suppliers. In a few countries, including China, cosmetics animal testing may still be a legal requirement for some ingredients and finished products.

Q: How can companies ensure safety without animal testing?

A: Safe existing ingredients are the key. Hundreds of companies—including LUSH, JASÖN and Kiss My Face—have sworn off animal testing, yet still produce new, safe and fabulous beauty products. They do so by choosing from among nearly 20,000 widely available raw ingredients that have been tested in the past, instead of purchasing newly developed chemicals that will also have been newly animal-tested. The safety of new product formulations made up from well known existing cosmetic ingredients can be assured using available non-animal testing methods.

Q: Why do companies still test cosmetics on animals if it’s not legally required?

A: Some companies believe that “innovation” requires the creation or use of new chemistries, which are invariably subject to new animal testing, either by or on behalf of the cosmetic manufacturer, or more commonly, by the specialty chemical producer itself. And multinational companies that sell cosmetics in such as China may be required to conduct new animal testing to meet the requirements of national authorities.

Q: What animal tests are carried out on cosmetics?

A: Newly-developed raw ingredients may be subject to the same sorts of animal tests as any other chemicals. This can include skin and eye irritation tests where chemicals are rubbed onto the shaved skin or dripped into the eyes of rabbits; repeated oral force-feeding studies lasting weeks or months to look for signs of general illness or specific health hazards, such as cancer or birth defects; and even widely condemned “lethal dose” tests, in which animals are forced to swallow massive amounts of a test chemical to determine the dose that causes death. At the end of a test the animals are killed, normally by asphyxiation, neck-breaking or decapitation. Pain relief is not provided.

Q: Besides animal welfare, are there other arguments against testing on animals?

A: Yes, animal tests also have scientific limitations because different species can respond differently when exposed to the same chemicals. Consequently, results from animal tests may not be relevant to humans, under- or over-estimating real-world hazards to people. In addition, results from animal tests can be quite variable and difficult to interpret. Unreliable and non-predictive animal tests mean consumer safety cannot be guaranteed.

Q: What are the alternatives to animal testing?

A: Cosmetics companies can stop animal testing immediately and still produce new, safe and exciting beauty products, by manufacturing the cruelty-free way.

Firstly, companies can use ingredients that are already known to be safe, of which there are thousands. These ingredients have been tested in the past and don’t require new testing. This is how so many socially conscious companies have been able to swear off animal testing.

Secondly, companies can use non-animal tests where new data need to be generated. More than 40 non-animal tests have been validated for use, and these modern alternatives can offer results that are more relevant to people, often more cheaply and efficiently too.

Advanced non-animal tests represent the very latest techniques that science has to offer, replacing outdated animal tests that have been around for many decades and haven’t stood the test of time. For example, there are a number of skin tests available that use human reconstructed skin, such as EpiDerm, as wells as the “3T3 NRU” test for sunlight-induced “phototoxicity”, and the Bovine Cornea Opacity and Permeability test for eye corrosion.

Q: What’s being done to end cosmetics animal testing in Canada?

A: Humane Society International has teamed up with Animal Alliance of Canada to launch the Canadian arm of Be Cruelty-Free—the largest global campaign to end cosmetics animal cruelty. Together we’re working to:

  • Change Canadian law to ban animal testing for cosmetic products and ingredients, and to end the sale of newly animal tested beauty products from other parts of the world.
  • Promote modern science, championing the development of new non-animal tests and training regulators and companies in their use.
  • Educate consumers, raising awareness about animal testing and how to shop cruelty-free.
  • Work with companies to help them move away from animal testing, and partnering with cruelty-free companies to lobby for change.
  • Build an unstoppable national campaign backed by the public, top companies, politicians and our celebrity friends Paul McCartney, Ricky Gervais, Ke$ha and more.

Q: How can I help?

A: Get involved with these easy actions and help HSI put an end to cosmetics animal cruelty:

  • Sign the Be Cruelty-Free pledge to show your support for Canadian ban on animal testing for cosmetic products and ingredients.
  • Donate to help HSI end animal testing for cosmetics in India and worldwide.
  • Shop cruelty-free—buy only from companies that say no to animal testing and to newly developed and animal-tested ingredients. Find cruelty-free products with the handy Leaping Bunny shopping guide, or download the iTunes app for your smart phone.
  • Contact your favourite brands and urge them to make the leap to cruelty-free. Ask whether the company 1) animal tests its products or ingredients, 2) purchases newly developed ingredients that have been animal tested by the supplier, or 3) sells its products to countries like China that may require new animal testing. If the answer to any of these questions is yes, put the product back on the shelf.
  • Make some noise—follow us on Twitter @HSI_Canada and tweet about the campaign using hashtag #BeCrueltyFree.

Get the facts about cosmetics animal testing and our fight to end this cruel and unnecessary practice worldwide

Humane Society International / Global


istock/PeopleImages

What criteria must be met for a cosmetic to be considered “cruelty-free”?

A: Different certification schemes exist around the world, but in general when a cosmetic is said to be “cruelty-free” it means the manufacturer has committed to 1) not conduct or commission animal testing of its finished products or ingredients after a certain date, and 2) monitor the testing practices of its ingredient suppliers to ensure they do not conduct or commission new animal testing either. Learn more at LeapingBunny.org.

Q: Where is cosmetic animal testing already banned?

A: Testing cosmetic products and their ingredients on animals was first banned in the United Kingdom in 1998, and later across all 27 countries in the European Union between 2004 and 2013. The EU has also banned the marketing of cosmetics that have been tested on animals after 2013, becoming the world’s largest market for cruelty-free cosmetics. This precedent paved the way for similar cosmetic animal testing and sales bans in Israel, India, Norway, Iceland and Switzerland. Australia, Colombia, Guatemala, New Zealand, South Korea, Taiwan, Turkey, 10 states in Brazil and 4 U.S. states have also passed laws to ban or limit cosmetic animal testing or sales.

Q: Where is cosmetic animal testing still required, and why?

A: “Cosmetic animal testing” can include testing of a finished product like a shampoo or lipstick, or the chemical ingredients in cosmetic formulation, such as dyes or preservative—or both.

  • Finished product testing is almost unheard of outside of China and a small handful of developing countries, and longstanding Chinese requirements for animal testing of imported regular cosmetics are expected to be lifted as of May 2021, subject to conditions.
  • Ingredient testing is performed by or on behalf of specialty chemical companies who supply cosmetic manufacturers and other industries. This type of testing is driven mainly by chemical laws—such as the European “Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals (REACH)” regulation and similar measures in other parts of the world—which require numerous different animal-poisoning tests to assess a chemical’s hazards. These new chemical laws are now the major threat to cruelty-free cosmetics, because even ingredients with long histories of safe use are the subject of new animal testing demands by chemical authorities.

Q: I thought Europe had banned cosmetic animal testing—what happened?

A: Disappointingly, the European Union’s precedent-setting bans are being circumvented from within by the European Chemicals Agency, with backing from the European Commission, which is demanding new animal testing of substances used exclusively as cosmetic ingredients. This is made possible by a legal loophole that separates protection of consumers, factory workers and the environment across two different laws, one of which bans animal testing (cosmetics regulation) while the other does not (chemicals regulation). HSI is working with other animal protection organizations, companies and EU policymakers to ensure the integrity of the EU’s hard-won ban on cosmetic animal testing remains strong.

Q: Is the UK’s cosmetics animal testing ban also under threat?

A: The UK government stated in December 2018 that it plans to maintain its longstanding restriction on the marketing of imported cosmetics that rely on animal testing safety data.

Q: What’s the latest on China’s animal testing policy?

A: In 2021, China made significant changes to its cosmetic regulations which could eliminate a large amount of animal testing. Beginning in May, requirements for animal testing of thousands of imported “regular” cosmetics could be waived if companies are able to provide satisfactory evidence of their safety according to Chinese requirements. This builds on a 2014 waiver of animal testing requirements for regular cosmetics that were manufactured in mainland China.

“Special” cosmetics, such as anti-perspirants, sunscreens and baby products, are still subject to more rigorous information requirements, and cosmetic ingredients new to China could also be required to undergo new animal testing if authorities are not satisfied with the standard of safety information provided.

Q: What are the alternatives to animal testing?

A: There are already thousands of products on the market that are made using ingredients with a long history of safe use and do not require additional tests. Companies can ensure safety by choosing to create products using those ingredients. Companies also have the option of using existing non-animal tests or investing in and developing non-animal tests for new ingredients. Nearly 50 non-animal tests are already available, with many more in development. Compared to animal tests, these modern alternatives can more closely mimic how humans respond to cosmetic ingredients and products; they are also often more efficient and cost-effective. Advanced non-animal tests represent the very latest techniques that science has to offer, replacing outdated animal tests that were developed decades ago.

Q: What is HSI doing to stop cosmetic testing on animals?

A: We—along with our local non-profit and corporate partners—are leading efforts to ban cosmetic animal testing and trade in 17 of the world’s largest and most influential beauty markets, including Brazil, Canada, Chile, Mexico, South Africa, Southeast Asia, Sri Lanka and the United States.

Our campaign seeks to ban 1) new animal testing of cosmetic products, 2) new animal testing of chemical ingredients for cosmetic purposes, 3) marketing of cosmetics containing ingredients that have been subject to new animal testing, and that rely on the results of this animal testing to demonstrate safety for cosmetic purposes.

We are also working with world-leading companies, including Unilever, L’Oréal, Procter & Gamble, Avon, Lush, and others through the Animal-Free Safety Assessment Collaboration to develop and disseminate a state-of-the-art non-animal cosmetic safety assessment curriculum to help companies and government authorities transition to modern non-animal methods.

Humane Society International


  • Stray dogs have found a safer alternative to the streets in India’s manifold university campuses. Rahul Sehgal/HSI

  • While far from ideal, life on campus is easier for these animals. Rahul Sehgal/HSi

  • The presence of strays on university campuses does however pose multiple challenges. Rahul Sehgal/HSI

India’s sprawling, government-owned university, college and research campuses are scattered across the nation. As odd as it may sound, these, along with leading space research centres, engineering hubs and global management institutes, make safe havens for the country’s stray dogs. Acres of tall, green trees provide shade and comfort through sweltering summers, and food sources are aplenty, thanks to onsite residences, cafeterias, and poor garbage disposal systems.

However, dog and man don’t necessarily coexist in harmony, due in part to the poor implementation of the Animal Birth Control (ABC) program by local municipal bodies, uncontrolled breeding of the animals, and short-term measures such as displacement (which never works!) taken by campus authorities.

A call for assistance

HSI/India was called upon to help out on one such campus, the Indian Institute of Management in Ahmedabad. The IIMs, as they’re known, exist at several locations throughout the country, and the one in Ahmedabad, in the west Indian state of Gujarat, has been called “the Harvard Business School of India.” The institute’s authorities had been struggling with a dog issue for several years. “The municipal authorities could not solve it, and obviously, there was nothing we could do directly,” said campus official and Group Head Mr. H.J Vadher

“The huge campus is located in the centre of the city, surrounded by the worst congestion of vehicular and human traffic. Naturally, the dogs are looking to find safe spots and almost every dog in the area attempts to get onto the campus and stick around,” said Rahul Sehgal, Ahmedabad resident and director, HSI/India.

Getting into action

Upon receiving the call, our team immediately began work on the problem. Several initiatives needed to be undertaken at once, including investigation of complaints, documenting the dogs’ conditions and their locations, and most importantly, setting up feeding stations.

Just before we stepped in, the number of dog bite and dog attack reports had skyrocketed. We started with a thorough investigation of the situation, probing every complaint more deeply. We found that many could be attributed to fear and phobia, which had deepened in recent times. This was especially true for reports of attacks. However, the problem could not be denied entirely as the dogs were indeed turning aggressive for a variety of reasons.

Give now to support our efforts to help street dogs in India and around the world.

One of the first things that we did was to work with campus staff to set up feeding stations. These served multiple purposes, including reducing aggression and allowing us to monitor the animals on a daily basis. “At the feeding stations, the team notes new entrants and observes the dogs for injuries or changes in behavior,” explained Sehgal. The stations also help the staff befriend the animals, so they are more compliant when the time comes to transfer them to the on-campus sterilization and vaccination centres. In some cases, humane catching methods like blow pipes are also used.

Keeping the dogs healthy and busy

Things, of course, are far from perfect. To controlling the dog population, ensure the animals’ constant welfare, and minimize conflicts requires a long-term commitment. Thankfully, campus authorities are aware of this. The current chief administrative officer of the institute, Mr. Manoj Bhatt, started work on the campus a few months before the first year of the project was nearing completion. “I had heard from my team about the situation with the dogs and I was glad to note that this project had been initiated. Reactions are mixed about the results, but it takes time to resolve a problem of this nature,” he said.

Mr.Vadher echoed Mr. Bhatt’s point of view: “Opinions may vary on how successful the program has been so far, but for us, as people in-charge on the campus, it a huge relief that there is an agency we can call to deal with the matter in a scientific manner. I would say there has been 80 percent improvement since the problem was at its peak in 2007. Complaints of bites and chasing have dropped dramatically.”

Many people who are generally anti-animal have hardly changed their stance, says faculty member Professor Navdeep Mathur. “The problem is not going to be solved immediately or forever… the notion of animal birth control has to become part of an institute’s ecology,” he said, adding emphatically, “although nobody will say this programme has not been a success.” Professor Mathur shared figures [note: these could not be verified] to complement our team on their efforts: “Where there used to be complaints of 10 bites a week, now there’s probably one every month. That’s a vast improvement,” he said.

A haven and an identity

As of February this year, our team had also completed a geotagging project with all the dogs on the campus, so we know the exact location of every dog, and since the pictures are tacked onto virtual maps, new team members and staff can easily identify the animals.

With more than 100 dogs sterilized, vaccinated, treated, fed and now being monitored, this pioneering welfare project is off to a fabulous start. The second year, our local team promises, will see the fruits of their efforts, with results expected to be unprecedented compared to any solutions attempted before.

“IIM-Ahmedabad has proven that it’s among the nation’s most forward-thinking institutes by taking an intellectual and humane approach to stray dog welfare. We’re so very proud of this partnership,” said Sehgal.

“It’s such a relief not to see dogs being chased or beaten with sticks or sick ones simply being heartlessly ignored,” said Professor Mathur, who, like many of us, is an animal lover, and for whom these things alone are half the battle won and a giant leap forward.

Humane Society International


 

Donate today, then take action to help end Canada’s cruel commercial seal slaughter.

Live in Canada?

Live in Europe?

Live in the United States?

Live elsewhere?

Chef or business?

Spread the word

Learn more

  • Check out our resources for more information.

Humane Society International


  • We’ve accomplished much with the help of our supporters. Marcus Gyger

Humane Society International is one of the only international animal protection organizations in the world working to protect all animals—including animals in laboratories, farm animals, companion animals, and wildlife—and our record of achievement demonstrates our dedication and effectiveness.

2015 Accomplishments

2014 Accomplishments

2013 Accomplishments

2012 Accomplishments

2011 Accomplishments

2010 Accomplishments

2009 Accomplishments

Join us today to help us achieve more in the years to come!

 

 

Humane Society International


  • This puppy was vaccinated to kick off the ceremony. Obhoyaronno

  • An enthusiastic audience member. Obhoyaronno

  • Animal-friendly t-shirts. Obhoyaronno

  • Rahul speaks at the event featuring the official announcement. HSI

A few years ago, Rubaiya Ahmed founded Obhoyaronno, a non-governmental organization with a focus on street dog welfare.

HSI has partnered with Obhoyaronno to better the lives of street dogs in Bangladesh through multiple meetings with government officials and ongoing training in spay/neuter and humane capture of dogs. We helped identify the key areas to focus on and worked within the cultural and social boundaries of Bangladesh to effect positive change.

Making a deal

Toward the end of last year, we supported the local group’s efforts to conduct a census of the street dog population in Dhaka; during this time, for about three months, dog culling was put unofficially on hold. HSI and Obhoyaronno pushed for an agreement that following the completion of training in humane animal control, dog culling would come to an end in Bangladesh.

A milestone victory

Last month, we were proud to stand alongside Obhoyaronno as the government announced an end to street dog culling in the country’s capital, Dhaka. Rahul Sehgal, director of HSI India, was one the speakers at the historic January 21, 2012 event. It was an unprecedented victory for street dog rights in this country: the first time that the culling of these animals has been called off in a Bangladesh city.

Help animals as an HSI Street Dog Defender.

Ensuring long-term success

However, the journey doesn’t end there. As agreed, sustained, effective spay/neuter programs by trained, local veterinarians will follow to ensure the long-term welfare of street dogs in Dhaka. HSI brought vets and paravets from Obhoyaronno to our newly established Jaipur Veterinary Training Center in India for month-long training sessions, including practice of our easy-to-perform spay/neuter surgery, typically coupled with vaccinations against diseases like rabies, a raging problem in Bangladesh.

HSI India’s veterinary teams, who have performed thousands of spay/neuter surgeries in countries like Bhutan, Philippines, and India, will also continue to visit Bangladesh to support their colleagues. Give today to support our work.

Learn More Button Inserter