Humane Society International


The following celebrities support Humane Society International’s/The Humane Society of the United States’ Be Cruelty-Free campaign, a global effort to end animal testing for cosmetics and personal care products. Join them at hsicanada.ca/becrueltyfree.

  • Ke$ha

    “True beauty doesn’t come from cruelty. That’s why I want to see an end to the testing of cosmetics and personal care products on helpless animals. Please join me in supporting  HSI’s/HSUS’s Be Cruelty-Free campaign.”

  • Paul McCartney

    “If every cosmetic tested on rabbits or mice had a photo on the packaging showing these animals with weeping swollen eyes and inflamed skin, I believe everyone would leave cruelty on the shelf.”

  • Michael Vartan

    “I am joining with HSI’s/HSUS’s Be Cruelty-Free campaign in calling for an end to the unspeakable cruelty so many animals endure for cosmetic testing. To try to rationalize animal testing for cosmetic purposes is simply disgusting. I plead with you to choose non-animal tested products whenever possible. We are these innocent animals’ only voice.”

  • Colbie Caillet

    “Everyone wants to look their best. And it’s great to know we can look and feel beautiful without causing pain to animals. HSI’s/HSUS’s Be Cruelty-Free campaign is urging companies to stop testing their products on animals. There are so many great products, from skin care products, to shampoo, to makeup, that are cruelty free—there’s just no reason to buy anything else.”

  • Bellamy Young

    Supporter of HSI’s/HSUS’s Be Cruelty-Free campaign.

  • Ricky Gervais

    “It’s shocking to think that behind the glamorous advertising and glossy packaging, there can lurk the ugly truth of chemicals forced down an animal’s throat.”

  • Pauley Perrette

    Supporter of HSI’s/HSUS’s Be Cruelty-Free campaign.

  • Kaley Cuoco

    Supporter of HSI’s/HSUS’s Be Cruelty-Free campaign.

  • Torrey Devitto

    “There is just no reason for animal testing of cosmetics to continue. I support an end to this horrible practice and I’m doing my part by purchasing cruelty-free cosmetics and supporting HSUS/HSI’s Be Cruelty-Free campaign.”

  • Seamus Dever & Jon Huertas

    Supporters of HSI’s/HSUS’s Be Cruelty-Free campaign.

  • Daniella Alonso

    “The Be Cruelty-Free campaign is calling for an end to needless and painful cosmetic testing on animals. Join me in choosing non-animal tested products.”

  • Fiona Gubelmann

    “Every time you buy lipstick, shampoo, or any cosmetic, you can help end animal suffering by purchasing cruelty-free products that haven’t been tested on animals. Join me in supporting HSI’s/HSUS’s Be Cruelty-Free campaign—it’s time for cosmetic testing on animals to end for good.”

  • Hal Sparks

    Supporter of HSI’s/HSUS’s Be Cruelty-Free campaign.

  • Francia Raisa

    “Many cosmetic and personal care companies still conduct painful product tests on bunnies, guinea pigs, and other animals. Be Cruelty-Free and choose non-animal tested products.”

  • Joanna Krupa

    Supporter of HSI’s/HSUS’s Be Cruelty-Free campaign.

  • Owain Yeoman

    Supporter of HSI’s/HSUS’s Be Cruelty-Free campaign.

  • Chrissie Hynde

    “Please check for a cruelty-free guarantee before buying a product and if it is not stated on the label, put it back on the shelf!”

  • Constance Marie

    Supporter of HSI’s/HSUS’s Be Cruelty-Free campaign.

  • Lindsay Pulsipher

    Supporter of HSI’s/HSUS’s Be Cruelty-Free campaign.

HSI analysis reveals government spends just 66p on non-animal replacement research for every animal in a UK laboratory

Humane Society International


As today the Home Office publishes its annual UK statistics on scientific procedures using animals – revealing animal use has reached a shocking 4.11million procedures – Humane Society International/UK calls for a substantial increase in government funding for the development of non-animal replacement methods. For 2011/2012, the government gave just £5.46million to the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research, with roughly one-third spent on research to replace animals. This is compared to an overall annual UK science budget of £4.6 billion.

In a new HSI video, biomedical researchers from Imperial College, London, The Blizzard Institute and Aston University, explain why replacing animals in cancer, gastrointestinal, respiratory and neurological research will reap significant rewards for human health.

Troy Seidle, Director of Research & Toxicology for HSI, said, “Despite a government pledge to reduce animal experiments and repeated claims that animals are only used when absolutely necessary, millions of mice, monkeys, rabbits, fish, dogs and other animals still suffer in UK laboratories. The excuse that this level of animal use benefits medical research is wearing thin. Increasingly, scientists are questioning the human-relevance of animal models, pointing to the need to invest in advanced, non-animal techniques to improve medical progress. Britain should be a world leader in developing this cutting-edge research, yet government spending on 21st century, non-animal replacement research remains woefully inadequate at 66p per animal in a UK laboratory. For human health and animal protection, we must do better than that.”

Take Action: Sign the pledge to Be Cruelty-Free.

“The government may prefer to talk about animals in laboratories as mere percentages because they belie the shocking scale of animal use. But the truth is, behind closed doors thousands of dogs and cats just like our beloved pets at home, are subjected to distressing and often terminal procedures; hundreds of highly intelligent monkeys endure physical and mental pain; and more than a million rabbits, guinea-pigs, hamsters and other rodents go through painful and invasive testing. These animals are not just statistics.”

In 2012, 4.11million procedures began on 4.03million animals including rabbits, fish, monkeys, rodents, dogs and horses—the highest level since the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act was introduced in 1986.

In May 2010, the government pledged a national reduction strategy “to reduce the use of animals in scientific research” in its publication ‘The Coalition: Our Programme for Government‘. Some 182 cross-party MPs signed EDM 435 in support of the reduction pledge.

Read the official Home Office statistics [pdf].

Humane Society International


  • Joyce Poole speaks for the elephants. HSI

  • David Brady of Houston Zoo. HSI

by Dr. Peter Li

Last month, HSI staff traveled to China with the mission of improving animal welfare in zoos and protection in the wild.

Reaching zoo directors

HSI invited world-renowned elephant researcher Dr. Joyce Poole and Vice Director of Houston Zoo David Brady to speak to 48 Chinese zoo directors, who also heard from three experts sent by Animals Asia.

HSI discussed the case of a young elephant who died last year not long after arriving in China from Africa, warning that the decision to import of animals for zoos must take their needs and behavior fully into consideration.

Dr. Poole, co-founder of Elephant Voices, shared her experiences from three decades in Kenya studying the behavior and communication of elephants. She presented captivating photos of the animals roaming freely and did an amazing imitation of elephant sounds. She stated that importing elephants is a bad idea because no captive setting can replicate the natural and social settings that they require.

Help stop illegal wildlife trade: Sign our Don’t Buy Wild pledge.

Finally, David Brady spoke on marketing strategies for zoos, emphasizing the importance of diversified but sensitive and humane approaches to attracting visitors. Indirectly, he rejected practices such as animal performances and photo-ops with drugged or chained animals as tactics to be avoided.

Reaching young conservationists

Meanwhile, HSI President & CEO Dr. Andrew Rowan visited Northeast China University of Forestry to lecture 60 graduate and undergraduate students on wildlife protection.

He discussed the causes of global wildlife loss—from habitat destruction to illegal wildlife trade—and the integral role that China has to play in addressing them. He suggested that public education and suspension of wildlife import were important steps for China to take. The students responded well with intelligent, enthusiastic questions.

In both cases, it was satisfying to know that sharing expertise with a receptive audience made up of people working at the forefront of wildlife issues in China could help to effect positive changes for the country’s animals.

Learn more and help

Learn more about HSI’s initiatives for wildlife protection, including stopping illegal wildlife trade and other wildlife crime, supporting rehabilitation of seized animals, stopping rhino poaching and promoting immunocontraception as a humane means of elephant population control.

Check out our interactive wildlife trade infographic; then sign our Don’t Buy Wild pledge and donate to support our work. 

Dr. Peter Li is HSI’s China Specialist.

An interview with HSI's Dr. Peter Li

Humane Society International


More than 30,000 HSI supporters signed our online petition calling for the cancellation of a dog meat festival planned for June 21 in Yulin, China. We spoke with Dr. Peter Li, HSI’s China policy specialist, about what happened.

HSI: Did the festival go on as planned?

Peter: The event was not cancelled, but it was much subdued compared to last year. I am told that public slaughter did not happen, display in the streets of dogs waiting to be killed was not seen, and billboards advertising the festival were removed. Instead, dogs were butchered out of view and their carcasses hung in restaurant windows and market stalls.

Last year, the organizers claimed that more than 10,000 dogs were slaughtered per day; this year, they made no such revelation.

Pressure from Chinese and international organizations and citizens apparently convinced Yulin authorities that it was a bad idea to publicize a controversial eating habit. In mid-June, they actually conducted a six-department joint law enforcement action to crack down on unlicensed slaughter operations.

HSI: A press conference about this issue was held in China during the week of the festival. Did it have any effect?

Peter: Chinese activists, Buddhist monks, scholars, and reporters attended a press event on June 17 calling for an end to the dog meat festival in the interest of public health, animal welfare, social morality, and social stability. Our letter to the Chinese ambassador to the U.S. and the many signatures of HSI supporters were shown. Media reports reached hundreds of millions of Chinese; phone calls following the press event almost incapacitated the phone service of the Yulin mayor’s office. Reports overwhelmingly questioned the dog meat festival and the dog-eating habit.

The changes to this year’s event were certainly a result of active intervention by the authorities. Some Chinese celebrities also joined in the opposition to Yulin. Stopping public killing is no small accomplishment.

HSI: Were there a lot of protesters and how did they impact the festival?

Peter: Some 20 activists converged on Yulin between June 3 and June 22, attracting journalists from mainland China and Hong Kong. Among them were famous Chinese artists who protested in front of the gigantic Yulin government office building, holding signs calling for an end to the dog meat festival. And across the country, hundreds of thousands of people voiced their views condemning the festival through social media.

The authorities and the dog meat industry know very well that the voices of opposition can never be underestimated. Bear farming used to be promoted by the Chinese government as a “poverty reduction activity,” but the Chinese public has never stopped challenging it and in 20 years, its reputation has gone from “highly praised” to “morally discredited” business operation. I believe that the dog meat trade will follow a similar path.

HSI: What’s next?

Peter: Dog eating is increasingly losing ground in China. I am cautiously optimistic that this habit will be history in the future.

HSI must continue our engagement with China’s dog meat trade and street dog overpopulation issues through our local partner groups. We should encourage advocates to keep pointing out the potential dangers of dog eating to human health, public morality and China’s international reputation. Our efforts in China can help make headway on this matter in South Korea and Viet Nam as well.

Humane Society International


  • There are plans in Spain to declare bullfighting cultural heritage. istock

As the number of visitors to bullfights falls, Spain’s politicians are considering a new law to sustain the cruel spectacles by declaring them cultural heritage, a move that would ensure additional public funds are spent on promoting and protecting the bloodsport across the country.

We’ve teamed up with other UK and international organisations, including the League Against Cruel Sports, PETA UK, the World Society for the Protection of Animals and CAS International, to raise awareness of the cruelty involved and to work with Spanish organisations, including La Tortura no es Cultura Platform, who are opposed to bullfighting and their government’s backing of it.

Our “Love Spain, Hate Bullfighting” campaign is gathering support from compassionate citizens all around the world.

Join us in speaking out against this terrible cruelty:
Live in the UK?
Live outside the UK?

Political discussions

The proposed legislation is now progressing through the Spanish parliament. Once the Culture Committee has discussed the details, the draft law will be debated and voted on. If approved, it could bring into question legislation approved by autonomous communities in Spain, such as the established ban on bullfighting in Catalonia (agreed in 2010).

Neither culture nor entertainment justify suffering

According to ex-matador D. Alvaro Múnera, bullfighting is “a cruel tradition, where the victim first off is innocent and where it is savagely tortured and massacred… it is ethically inconceivable.”

The torment and death of animals for amusement can never be acceptable and in the 21st century wanton animal cruelty can no longer hide behind cultural excuses. Bullfighting is brutal and outdated, and has no place in a modern society.

A declining industry

A recently commissioned opinion poll showed that 76 per cent of Spanish citizens are opposed to the use of public funds to support bullfighting and only 29 per cent support the practice. Just 13 percent support it “strongly.”

According to the country’s Culture Ministry, the annual attendance figure at bullfights is just 8.5 per cent of the population [1]. The number of bullfights held between 2007 and 2011 dropped from 3,650 a year to 2,290, a figure that is thought to have decreased further during 2012.

Learn more about the bullfighting issue.

1. Survey of Cultural Habits and Practices in Spain 2010-2011.

Australia v. Japan re: whaling in the Southern Ocean

Humane Society International


June 26, 2013 saw the opening of a landmark case about whaling at the International Court of Justice [1] in The Hague in the Netherlands. The case will ultimately be decided upon by the ICJ’s presiding judges and there is no appeal mechanism.

Background

In 1982, the International Whaling Commission agreed to a moratorium on commercial whaling, which came into force in 1986.

Some countries, as is their legal right, took formal objections to this decision and so were not bound by it. Japan did not stop whaling and since 1987, it has characterized its whaling as “scientific research.”

Article VIII of the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling allows countries to self-allocate quotas by issuing “special permits” to their own nationals for research. When the convention was agreed upon in 1946, many modern non-lethal techniques for study were not available and many believe that Japan has used this clause to circumvent the commercial whaling ban, in breach thereby of its obligations under the convention.

Japan’s “scientific whaling” has led to the deaths of more than 10,000 whales in the Southern Ocean Sanctuary, which the IWC established and intended to be a no-whaling zone.

Proceedings and arguments

Australia’s main points were:

  • that Japan has continued commercial whaling and had inappropriately re-branded its activity as scientific;
  • that Japan has acted in bad faith and failed to abide by the decisions and resolutions of the IWC.

New Zealand—allowed to join the case to make a short intervention—essentially supported Australia in its interpretation of the relevant treaty law.

Japan countered:

  • that Australia and its allies are seeking to change the meaning of the treaty;
  • that its research is “applied science” and important for whale management;
  • that the matter is outside of the jurisdiction of the ICJ.

Key issues in the debate included the refusal in 2005 of a large number of the scientists on the IWC’s Scientific Committee to review the Japanese proposal for the current phase of its Southern Ocean “research” and also why Japan had not developed non-lethal approaches in its investigations.

A landmark case

This case is precedent-setting for several reasons:

  • Australia has brought a unique case on the behalf of a group of animals to the highest court on the planet.
  • It is the first case that relates to endangered species that has been heard by the ICJ.
  • It has focused on a debate about what does and does not constitute science (with experts being called by both sides).
  • Whatever the judges decide, it is likely to change the situation at the IWC forever, with probable knock-on effects for other treaties and aspects of international law.

Our position

HSI is strongly supportive of the arguments being made by Australia and in fact first put forward the idea for this case more than a decade ago. We are grateful to Australia for taking this matter forward and hope that this will lead to the permanent end of commercial whaling in the Southern Ocean.

We will report the conclusions of the case as soon as we hear them.


 1. The ICJ is the main legal body of the United Nations and, more typically, considers matters related to boundary disputes between nations.

Humane Society International


  • Demonstrating positive interaction. HSI

  • A friendly pat. HSI

by Keren Nazareth

The Sri Dorabji Tata Trust will invest USD $1 million over the next three years to make Jamshedpur, India an animal-friendly city. HSI is the lead implementing agency and has begun work on a project to raise community awareness.

“HSI will build a model for humane animal birth control practices in India. Our motive in seeking this collaboration was to be able to demonstrate success for a humane dog management plan—from monitoring and gathering information to humane handling and community participation,” says Rahul Sehgal, Director, Asia for HSI.

The program has so far undertaken scientific surveys, based on which the ABC project will be planned. The University of Glasgow will set up a database to help with data collection/analysis, a significant part of this model and a learning process.

Creating a team

HSI will employ Animal Welfare Officers to involve the community in the project by asking residents to observe dogs after (spay/neuter) surgery and phone a helpline if they see any who seem unwell. A dedicated team with a van will follow up as needed.

Support our efforts by becoming a Street Dog Defender.

The AWOs will also set an example for human-dog contact. According to HSI consultant Joy Lee, “We heard anecdotal evidence that people like friendly dogs and will even try to take them home, although the dogs usually escape and find a way back to their territories. We hope that positive interactions will lead to more sociable animals, which in turn will lead to good human-dog relationships and ultimately to more adoptions.”

HSI will train the AWOs in human behavior change, community engagement techniques and innovative dog trapping methods. Meanwhile, a holding facility managed by HSI will be crucial to increasing efficiency and hygiene and decreasing the stress of the animals during the post-op period.

Demonstrating, then replicating

This project is unique in its phased approach and clear focus on generating evidence-based lessons for others to follow. Innovation in both process and technology will be key to improving the ABC model, first in Jamshedpur and then hopefully throughout India and other Asian countries facing similar challenges. Give now to help street dogs worldwide.

Humane Society International


In April 2013, more than 2,000 dogs were intercepted and seized as smugglers attempted to ship them out of Thailand via Laos. They were bound for Vietnamese restaurants, victims of the illegal dog meat trade.

Overwhelmed and at risk

Our local partner organization, Soi Dog Foundation, put out a call for help after the shelter that took in the dogs—already caring for more than 1,000 animals—in swelled to overcapacity and disease began to spread.

Led by Dr. Rey del Napoles, our team worked with volunteers from other animal welfare organizations and the shelter’s own staff to treat sick and wounded dogs as well as improve overall conditions and thus the likelihood of longer-term survival.

Support our efforts to fight the dog meat trade and keep all animals safe.

Lifesaving changes

We were able to have a significant impact on the situation, instituting new policies and procedures that quickly reduced the suffering and mortality rate that the shelter had been experiencing prior to our vets’ arrival.

Overall, we trained local staff, including vets, in best practices for care of animals in shelters and improved animal welfare standards for dogs who will arrive at this shelter and others now being built to accommodate those confiscated in the future. Some changes we made:

  • We moved the most adoptable dogs to locations with more exposure to the public.
  • We introduced feeding troughs so the weaker, smaller dogs would have broader access to food.
  • We instituted vital disease control measures.
  • We assisted with a mass spay/neuter campaign.

The amazing generosity from supporters like you makes our lifesaving work possible.

Each dog has a story

Every day, Dr. del Napoles and the other vets treated dog after dog selected from the pens full of animals in need of attention. Three in particular stood out.

Sweet Krapro

Krapro (pronounced “ka-pow,” meaning “hot basil”) is a Thai Ridgeback and Spitz mix dog. She roams freely around the facility, as she refused to be kept in a cage. She is very sweet and smart, exhibiting the sort of exemplary social skills sometimes found in cherished pets.

Brave Lilly

During transport, dogs are often placed in either rusty metal cages or plastic chicken coops. They can barely stand or move around. Piled onto each other, some sustain serious injuries.

Lilly suffered this misfortune. She arrived at the shelter with severe damage to her hind legs, dragging them around due to paralysis of the pelvic region. After being treated for illness, she was fitted with a wheelchair that allows her to romp the hospital premises.

The friendliness of Kraprow and Lilly suggests that they were likely people’s companions, snatched from their homes by pitiless dealers interested only in profit.

Lucky Honeyboo

When Kate Hodal, Southeast Asia correspondent for The Guardian, visited the Nakhon Phanom Shelter to do an in-depth article on the dog meat trade, she noticed a scrawny brown dog she later named Honeyboo. In the course of the day, she started to ask more and more about the condition of the dog. Eventually, she decided to keep her as her companion in her rented apartment in Bangkok.

Honeyboo will have to stay at the shelter for a few more weeks to recover from poor nutrition and an infected wound, but then Kate will take her home and shower her with the love she deserves.

Urgent need

It was heartbreaking to see how much trust Krapro, Lilly and Honeyboo still had in humans after the way they were treated. We hope that the recommendations we made will allow more dogs like them a second chance at life after their initial rescue. At the same time, we’re doing all we can to stop this brutal trade for good.

Please give now to help stop animal cruelty.

Humane Society International


 

Public health authorities say a pandemic of influenza, triggered by bird or swine flu, is inevitable, impacting millions around the globe. The influenza virus has existed for millions of years as a harmless intestinal virus of wild ducks. What turned it into a killer?

In the last few decades, an unprecedented number of killer diseases have spread from the animal kingdom: AIDS from the African bush meat trade; SARS from live animal markets; and monkeypox from the exotic pet trade.

Today, we raise billions of animals for food in stressful, overcrowded, unhygienic conditions that can be breeding grounds for disease. Factory farming practices have been linked to mad cow disease, multidrug-resistant bacterial infections, Nipah virus, and most dangerously, bird flu and swine flu. Factory farms are a public health menace. You can help by supporting stricter regulations and oversight of them.

Learn more

Humane Society International


Pigs confined in gestation crates
agnormark/iStock.com

A number of governments around the world, including in Australia, New Zealand, and the European Union, are improving the welfare of farm animals by restricting the use of extreme confinement systems, including barren battery cages for egg-laying hens and sow stalls/gestation crates for breeding pigs; a number of U.S. states have taken similar steps.

Further, corporations around the world are mandating that their suppliers move to higher-welfare housing systems, including a phase-out of cage and crate confinement.

Moving abroad

As animal welfare standards are strengthened in these more affluent nations, there may be a risk that objectionable animal production practices will shift to other parts of the world with weaker regulations. The majority of growth in farm animal populations—along with factory farming practices—is already taking place in developing and emerging economies.

Contributions—of public tax money—to international finance institutions (such as the World Bank Group) and government-backed export credit agencies in countries that have phased out the life-long confinement of animals in barren battery cages and sow stalls are being used to support the same extreme confinement systems in developing and emerging economies.

Consumers in Asia, Latin America, Africa, and Eastern/Central Europe care about animals too. Responsible investments in agriculture should respect their values.

Heading off trouble

HSI is working with international finance institutions, governments (particularly in the EU, which has made noteworthy progress in the area of farm animal welfare over the past decade) and international agricultural development organizations to stop the financing of massive agribusiness companies employing extreme confinement systems in new locations.

By supporting factory farms, these entities inadvertently contribute to the unnecessary suffering of millions of animals. They also disadvantage farmers more concerned with animal welfare (both from developed and developing countries) in local, regional, and global markets for eggs, meat, and milk.

Together with other animal protection organizations, we are promoting the implementation of binding minimum animal housing criteria which should be complied with before any investment capital is granted.

Learn more and take action

  • Speak out for better treatment for hens.
  • Donate to help us improve life for farm and other animals.
  • Read more about the problems with animal welfare in international finance institutions.
  • Learn more about plant-based eating.
  • Join us to receive news and action alerts about helping animals.

Learn More Button Inserter