Humane Society International / Global


Dog outside with chain
Larry French/AP Images for The HSUS

What is dogfighting?

Dogfighting is a sadistic “contest” in which two dogs—specifically bred, conditioned, and trained to fight—are placed in a “pit” to fight each other for the spectators’ entertainment and gambling.

Fights average one to two hours, ending when one of the dogs will not or cannot continue. In addition to these organized dogfights, street dogfights are a problem in many urban areas.

How does it cause animal suffering?

The injuries experienced by dogs participating in dogfights are frequently severe, even fatal. Both the winning and losing dogs can suffer severe bruising, deep puncture wounds, and broken bones. Dogs used in these events may die of blood loss, shock, dehydration, exhaustion, or infection hours or even days after the fight. Other animals are often sacrificed as well; dogs who are born “cold,” or won’t fight, are often killed (called culling in the dogfighting world) by brutal methods such as shooting, drowning, beating, electrocution, or even letting other dogs tear them apart.

Are there other concerns?

Yes. Numerous law enforcement raids in countries where it is illegal have unearthed many disturbing facets of this “sport.” Young children are sometimes present at the events, which can promote insensitivity to animal suffering, enthusiasm for violence, and disrespect for the law.

Gambling is the norm at dogfights. Dog owners and spectators wager money on their favorites.

Dogfighting is typically a cluster crime, meaning that dogfighters are often involved in other illicit activates. Illegal firearms, other weapons and drugs are commonly found at dogfights. Homicides and child pornography and abuse are not uncommon in dogfighting.

Why should dogfighters be strongly penalized?

Because dogfighting yields such large profits for participants, minor fines are not a sufficient deterrent. Dogfighters merely absorb them as part of the cost of doing business. The cruelty inherent in dogfighting should be punished by more than a slap on the wrist. Dogfighting is not a spur-of-the-moment act; it is a premeditated and cruel practice.

Those involved in dogfighting go to extensive lengths to avoid detection by law enforcement, so investigations can be difficult, dangerous, and expensive. Law enforcement officials are more inclined to investigate dogfighting if it is considered a serious offense. As more places make dogfighting a significant crime, those remaining locations with low penalties will become magnets for dogfighters.

In the United States, dogfighting is a felony offense in all 50 states, and it is a felony offense under federal law as well. It is banned to some extent in 55 countries around the world.

Should being a spectator also be a crime?

Yes. Spectators provide much of the profit associated with dogfighting. The money generated by admission fees and gambling helps keep this “sport” alive. Because dogfights are illegal and therefore not widely publicized, spectators do not merely happen upon a fight; they seek it out. They are willing participants who support a criminal activity through their paid admission and attendance.

What can I do to help stop dogfighting?

How your donation is used

Humane Society International


HSI Latin America Rescue Team
James Rodriguez/AP Images for HSI

The International Disaster Relief Fund is a continuing, dedicated fund that enables Humane Society International to help animals impacted by natural disasters. The fund supports HSI’s rescue and relief efforts for past, present and future natural disasters such as earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, wildfires and oil spills.

Disaster preparation and response-related activities that donations support include:

  • Rescuing and providing temporary shelter to animals in need
  • Renting and outfitting animal-sheltering facilities
  • Purchasing, renting and outfitting rescue vehicles, including trucks and boats
  • Helping lost and displaced animals reunite with their families
  • Hiring disaster-response staff and training staff and volunteer responders
  • Helping shelters and other animal-protection facilities in disaster-affected regions
  • Educating the public about the importance of taking pets with them during disaster evacuations and planning for those evacuations
  • Assisting private humane organizations and federal, state and local officials in preparing for and responding to disasters that affect pets
  • Increasing the infrastructure and capacity of HSI’s disaster response efforts through fundraising, education and awareness raising

Help animals left lost or injured by disaster.

HSI decides how to use donations to the International Disaster Relief Fund based on immediate and long-term needs in the localities affected by the disaster(s). Our priority is always to use donations in the most effective and efficient way possible so that we are always ready to help animals in times of disaster. Give now to support our life-saving work.

Humane Society International


Give now to support our vital disaster response efforts.

November 12, 2013

Relief workers have arrived in Tacloban City with humanitarian aid and while there are long lines for supplies, a measure of order has returned to the strike zone. With this, our team of three veterinarians and two technical staff is headed to Leyte and Tacloban City. Rahul Sehgal, HSI’s Asia Director, will arrive in Cebu today and lead the team. On the basis of their assessment, we will send over emergency funding to support animal-related response efforts.


November 11, 2013

Typhoon Haiyan has struck with devastating force in the Philippines, and we have an experienced veterinary team on the ground in Cebu, the biggest island in the strike zone. While authorities struggle to organize and deliver humanitarian relief, we’re preparing an animal-focused response.

Our team has already carried out an assessment of the northeast region of Cebu and met with local representatives to offer support. Our responders are also preparing to visit two other hard-hit islands as soon as they receive the necessary clearance. We’ll work in close cooperation with local and federal officials to provide comprehensive aid.

For the last four years, HSI has stationed personnel in the Philippines as part of our worldwide street dog welfare campaign. They’re familiar with the country, they’re close to its people, and they’re committed to helping animals in crisis. Donate to our International Disaster Fund.

Humane Society International


  • Community dogs are everywhere. HSI

  • Some harmless, temporary color helps keep the count accurate. HSI

  • Many animals live in makeshift outdoor doghouses. HSI

  • Chained up. HSI

  • Many homes in rural areas have guard dogs. HSI

This summer, with support from the Ministry of Agro Industry and Food Security and assistance from partner organizations Mauritius Society for Animal Welfare and PAWS, HSI conducted an island-wide survey to estimate the number of street dogs present in Mauritius. This survey was designed based on scientific sampling principles similar to those used to conduct public opinion polling.

Significant overpopulation

The results indicate that there are approximately 55,000-60,000 street dogs in Mauritius, which is equivalent to one street dog for every 20 human residents. This estimate does not include owned dogs who are completely or predominantly confined to houses or yards. It was previously estimated that the total dog population in Mauritius is 200,000, which suggests that street dogs comprise nearly one-third of all dogs.

Give now to support our efforts to help street dogs.

The information was shared with government officials, who invited HSI to help prepare a long-term strategy for dealing with the issue.

Gathering information

The next phase will include another survey, this time door-to-door. It is planned for November 2013, to be conducted jointly with MSAW and PAWS. The Ministry of Agro-Industry and Food Security will also provide logistical support.

“A door-to-door survey will allow us to understand the animal-related issues that are important to Mauritians, and how to best address them,” explains HSI’s John Boone.

“A dog population survey had never been carried out in Mauritius and the number of street dogs has always been debatable. Now, a first survey of the number of strays has already been completed and a second survey targeting owned dogs will be carried out shortly. As a result, we will have a better understanding of the situation and this will help us strategize for the mass sterilization project in our quest for more humane and effective population control,” says Mr. Dabeedyal, Assistant Permanent Secretary of the Ministry.

“We are very proud of the Mauritian government in their move to adopt a humane solution and will assist however we can,” adds Moira Van Der Westhuizen, president of PAWS.

Making it happen

Mr. Dabeedyal and Mr. Ram Prakash Nowbuth, Permanent Secretary of the Ministry, are open to financially supporting a country-wide spay/neuter program. HSI will be presenting a detailed proposal. One challenge that remains is the lack of trained veterinarians and this will be a key aspect of the program moving forward.

This will be HSI’s largest Dog Population Management Program yet, if all goes smoothly—a “unique and valuable opportunity to build a large-scale, cooperative dog management project from the ground up,” says Boone. Donate to help.

 

Humane Society International


  • Horsemeat is imported to the EU from countries such as Argentina, Mexico and Canada. Kathy Milani/The HSUS

What many European horsemeat consumers do not know is that, in addition to the 250,000 horses that are annually slaughtered for food in the European Union, huge quantities of horsemeat are also routinely imported to the EU from the other side of the globe. Argentina, Mexico, Canada, Uruguay and Brazil are the main exporters of horsemeat to Europe. [1]

Born in the USA

Canada and Mexico are presently two of the main exporters of horsemeat to Europe. However, the majority of horses slaughtered in Canada and Mexico are in fact born and raised in the United States. Data from the European Commission [2] has shown that at least 85 per cent of horses slaughtered at EU approved Canadian horse slaughterhouses originated in the US and 50 per cent of the horsemeat produced from those animals was exported to the EU.

Long distance transport and slaughter welfare concerns

Horses in both North and Latin America are often subjected to horrific long-distance transport to slaughterhouses and animal welfare can be seriously compromised at slaughter.

Undercover footage taken at Canadian slaughterhouses (and here) revealed significant animal welfare concerns, including the failure to ensure that horses were killed humanely. The establishments featured in this footage are specifically approved for the export of horsemeat to the EU.

Likewise, shocking film footage from a European coalition of animal protection groups revealed the appalling conditions under which horses are cruelly kept, transported and slaughtered in Canada, Mexico, Brazil and Argentina. The publicity surrounding this footage eventually led to horsemeat from these countries being removed from some major food retailers’ shelves and a conspicuous reduction in imports to Belgium from these countries.

Belgium: The lead EU importer

Belgium is not only the biggest importer of horsemeat from outside the EU, but Belgian companies also have an important stake in horse slaughter operations in both North and Latin America (as well as in Australia and New Zealand) either co-owning abattoirs or engaging in joint ventures with local partners.

The majority of horsemeat shipped to Belgium is exported to other EU Member States, notably France, Italy and the Netherlands.


1. Read our briefing notes on horse slaughter in Mexico [PDF], South America [PDF] and Australia & New Zealand [PDF] to find out where the meat is exported to and the welfare concerns related to this trade. We have also compiled statistics showing the number of horses killed for horsemeat worldwide [PDF].

2. European Commission, Health and Consumers Directorate-General (2012) Final report of an audit carried out in Canada from 13 to 23 September 2011 in order to evaluate the monitoring of residues and contaminants in live animals and animal products, including controls on veterinary medical products DG(SANCO) 2011-8913 – MR FINAL.

Humane Society International


  • Vulcan, the bull killed at this year’s Toro de la Vega fiesta. PACMA/HSI

Campaigners in Spain have called for a tourism award bestowed on the Toro de la Vega bull fiesta in 1980 to be removed.

The event, which sees a bull chased, tormented and stabbed to death as part of an annual celebration, is listed as a “Fiesta de Interés Turístico” (Fiesta of Tourist Interest).

An official request to revoke such status has been submitted to the Council of Culture and Tourism in the autonomous region of Castile and Leon, Spain, by the Animalista Party (PACMA).

Cruelty is not entertainment, nor should it be promoted as a tourist attraction. Events such as the Toro de la Vega should not be rewarded for allowing cruelty to be inflicted on animals.

Sign our “Cruelty is Not a Tourist Attraction” pledge today!

The request follows a demonstration held earlier this month calling for an end to the bull fiesta, part of the “Break a Spear” campaign supported by HSI, held in central Madrid and attended by more than 15,000 people.

The 2013 Toro de la Vega fiesta took place on Tuesday, 17 September. The bull, Vulcan, was chased out of the town and into the surrounding countryside, where men on foot and horseback, including 50 officially registered “spearmen”, hunted him down. The cornered animal was then stabbed to death. Press reports claimed the chasing and killing took 18 minutes.

Find out more about our campaign to end cruel bull fiestas.

Humane Society International


by Peter Li

In June, a dog meat festival was held as planned in June in Yulin, Guangxi, southwest China despite worldwide condemnation. This year, however, the festival was uncharacteristically quiet, low-key and subdued.

A protest in front of Yulin government offices helped send a strong message to the local authorities that brutality brings no tourists or economic profit. The event brought shame to the city and to China as well. More than 42,000 HSI supporters signed a petition calling for it to be cancelled.

There is nothing to be celebrated about suffering.

On the ground

As the streets became crowded with cages full of doomed animals, members of Guangyuan BoAi Animal Protection Group, a long-time HSI partner organization, took action to help coordinate a rescue campaign.

With funding from HSI and two Chinese groups, BoAi was able to save 421 dogs (including the newborn puppies of two exhausted mothers who had given birth under the blazing hot sun) from butchers’ knives.

Unfortunately, 22 dogs died soon after they were unloaded from the traders’ truck, but the surviving 399 were readied for transport to a shelter more than 1500 kilometers away.

Difficult conditions

The journey proved to be an added burden for these animals who had already been through so much. On the road, despite their rescuers’ best efforts, more did not survive.

When they arrived at the shelter after crossing three provinces, 110 dogs were moved into their new temporary home, where they received immediate veterinary attention.

Sixty-seven of them have been adopted, and the rest continue to receive loving care.

HSI is working hard both to end the dog meat trade and to encourage the growing animal advocacy movement in China.

Dr. Peter Li is HSI’s China Specialist.

Humane Society International


  • Questions on humaneness remain unanswered. Stuart Matthews

by Mark Jones

Eleven months on, and our attempt to access information on how “humaneness” is to be assessed during the badger culls has been thwarted again after the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) launched a last-minute appeal against an order to release the details, issued by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO).

The assessment of whether killing more than 70 per cent of badgers in a cull zone within a six-week period can be done humanely is one of the three reasons stated by DEFRA for doing the pilot culls.

Gravely concerned about the potential suffering of badgers targeted, HSI has been trying to establish how the department plans to measure the humaneness, or otherwise, of the methods employed by gunmen to shoot badgers.

Decision on cull roll-out

That data, collected during the pilot culls, will be assessed by Ministers before any decision on whether to roll out the killing to other areas of England is made—a decision on which the fate of up to 130,000 animals in up to 40 different areas of England could depend over the coming years. Therefore, it is important that the information be in the public domain to allow the public and parliamentarians to see it and to ensure it can be independently reviewed and evaluated.

HSI/UK sumbitted a Freedom of Information request to DEFRA, asking five specific questions, in October 2012. DEFRA has resisted disclosure ever since. HSI involved the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the body that oversees Freedom of Information requests, in January 2013. The ICO ruled in HSI’s favour and requested that DEFRA release the information in August 2013; DEFRA lodged an appeal against that decision in September 2013.

After almost a year, this last 11th-hour appeal seems to be nothing more than a cynical move by DEFRA to keep secret important information about how badger pain and suffering is to be assessed during the pilot cull.

View our “Accessing Information on Humaneness” timeline.

Further information about DEFRA’s lack of transparency is included in Team Badger’s report, “Keeping The Public In The Dark”.

Find out more about our campaign to protect badgers.

Mark Jones is executive director of HSI/UK.

Humane Society International / Global


The rabbit has become synonymous with cosmetics animal testing the world over and the image most often used on cruelty-free labelling. Rabbits are still widely used in eye and skin tests for consumer products and, alongside guinea pigs, rats and mice, endure untold suffering for the beauty industry.

Life in the lab

Like so many animals condemned to a life in the laboratory, rabbits used in experiments are denied the ability to express many of their natural behaviours. In the wild, rabbits live in burrows in large communities. They are shy and sensitive creatures who mostly rest in the underground darkness during the day and forage at night. Being suited to an essentially nocturnal existence makes rabbits extremely sensitive to light. They also have an acute sense of hearing which they rely on to sense predators.

Life in the laboratory is a world away from this natural environment. Often housed in isolation, in bare, wire cages without sufficient space or environmental enrichment, rabbits are prone to loneliness and boredom. Their senses are also overloaded with constant, bright artificial lighting from which there is no escape, and incessant noise such as the clanging of metal cages and loud music blaring from radios. These can all cause these sensitive animals to become stressed, which in turn can weaken their immune system, making them prone to illness. They can also suffer sore and damaged feet from standing in metal caging, and even self-mutilate to relieve their anxiety.

Testing

Over the years, rabbits have most often been used in the Draize Eye and Skin tests. Developed in the 1940s, these tests involve holding rabbits in full body restraints so that chemicals can be dripped in their eye or spread on their shaved and scraped skin. The restraint stops the animals from pawing at their eyes or back to relieve the discomfort and so interfere with the experiment. The Draize test is used to measure irritation or corrosion caused to the eye or skin, but it is notoriously unreliable, producing highly variable results. It is also extremely unpleasant and painful, causing eye reddening, swelling, ulceration, even blindness, or skin cracking and bleeding.

Why rabbits?

There is very little science behind the reason why rabbits are used. It has more to do with practical considerations—they are small and gentle and so easy to handle; they are relatively cheap to maintain if only basic standards are adhered to; and they breed fast, creating new test subjects quickly. Rabbits also have no tear ducts so, unlike humans, they can’t cry out harmful substances from their eye. This means that in the Draize eye test the rabbit’s eye is exposed to more of the test chemical for longer periods, which is one of the main reasons why rabbits are chosen for this procedure.

Alternatives

Human skin equivalent tests, EpiDerm™ and EpiSkin™ have been scientifically validated and accepted to completely replace animal tests for skin corrosion and irritation, and SkinEthic has also been approved to replace animals for skin irritation. The BCOP (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability) test and the ICE (Isolated Chicken Eye) test have been validated and accepted as replacements for live animals in eye irritancy. The cell-based Fluorescein Leakage Test, while not a 1:1 replacement for the rabbit test, can also be used as part of a step-wise strategy to considerably reduce the number of animals subjected to eye irritancy testing. Most recently, scientists in Japan have developed a new in vitro eye irritation method using human cornea cells which shows promise as an additional replacement option of the future.

In addition to these available alternatives, cruelty-free companies can simply avoid using new ingredients that require new test data. There are thousands of such ingredients available that have long histories of safe use and don’t require any new testing at all.

The Leaping Bunny

The Leaping Bunny standard guarantees that a product and its ingredients are cruelty-free, by requiring companies to pledge that they will not conduct or commission animal tests for any of their finished products, ingredients, or formulations after a fixed cut-off date or purchase new ingredients that have been animal tested after that date. Look out for the Leaping Bunny on products and online when choosing your cosmetics.

Be Cruelty-Free

With bunnies having suffered so much over the years for the cosmetics industry, little wonder we chose a rabbit to represent our global Be Cruelty-Free campaign to end cosmetics cruelty worldwide. Around the world, our Be Cruelty-Free campaign is leading the charge to end the suffering of rabbits, mice and other animals still suffering for cosmetics. These animals have no voice, but you can speak up for them by signing our Be Cruelty-Free pledge today and supporting our campaign to turn the whole world cruelty-free.

Humane Society International


Through a partnership with the Vietnamese government, HSI’s “I’m a Little Rhino” book will be used in schools to help teach children about rhino poaching concerns and conservation efforts.

Watch the “I’m a Little Rhino” video.

You can click the lower-left icon to view in full-screen mode, or here to download a PDF.

Learn More Button Inserter