BRASÍLIA—Brazil’s senate has approved a new chemical management bill that restricts animal testing to a “last resort” and requires development of a strategic plan to fully transition away from animal use, measures championed by Humane Society International. These measures, if endorsed by Brazil’s president, will compel the adoption of modern, human-relevant science, benefiting citizens, the environment, and animals alike.
“HSI is proud to have actively collaborated with the Brazilian Government and legislators in crafting this law, which reflects modern, ethical approaches to chemical testing. This law represents another step forward for animals in our country,” said Antoniana Ottoni, senior federal affairs specialist for Humane Society International in Brazil. “We commend the Government and Congress for their leadership in protecting animals used in chemical safety testing. By prioritizing animal-free methods, Brazil is positioning itself as a leader in ethical science and setting an example for other countries to follow.”
Senator Fabiano Contarato, who authored the Bill report at the Social Issues Commission said: “This new legislation is very welcome, and it will equate the country with the big nations regarding the commitments about chemical management, that is an important matter for all society. The choice to use modern technologies to assure the safety of chemicals and not rely on old and cruel animal testing is the right way to go”.
Humane Society International remains committed to working with policymakers, scientists, and the public to ensure the successful implementation of the new law and the development of the strategic plan.
Humane Society International/Europe hails groundbreaking decision for animal protection in Romania
Humane Society International / Europe
HSI
BUCHAREST/BRUSSELS—Humane Society International/Europe is celebrating a monumental victory for animal protection in Romania today, as the Romanian Parliament has voted overwhelmingly to ban chinchilla and mink fur farming, the only two fur farm industries that exist in the country. This groundbreaking decision is the result of nearly two years of political debates and sustained campaigning by HSI/Europe’s Romania office and fellow animal groups. Romania now becomes the 22nd country in Europe and 16th EU Member State to ban fur farming, marking a significant milestone in HSI’s global campaign to end the cruel practice of breeding and killing animals for fur fashion.
Ruud Tombrock, executive director for HSI/Europe, said: “Today’s decision to ban fur farming is not only a landmark moment for animal protection in Romania, but also a pivotal step in the broader European effort to end one of the cruelest forms of exploitation of animals. As public concern for animal welfare grows across Europe, demonstrated by the overwhelming success of the Fur Free Europe ECI, it is clear that fur farming has no place in a compassionate and ethical society and the only way to move forward is by adopting an EU-wide ban on production of fur.”
The bill was originally proposed after HSI/Europe conducted a shocking undercover investigation exposing appalling conditions on fur farms in Romania. Chinchillas were filmed confined in small, filthy wire cages, only to be killed for fur fashion at just a few months old in improvised gas chambers or by having their necks broken. Now that the bill has been voted through in the Chamber of Deputies, once promulgated it will make fur farming illegal in Romania effective 1st of January 2027. Although the legislation must be promulgated by President Klaus Iohannis and published in the Official Journal to become effective, this is anticipated to pass without delay.
According to a nationwide survey commissioned by HSI/Europe, over 67% of Romanians support a fur farming ban, further emphasizing public sentiment against the fur industry. In addition, HSI/Europe’s campaign in Romania gathered more than 74,000 petition signatures in favor of ending fur farming, which HSI/Europe submitted to the Romanian Parliament.
The fur industry in Romania is in decline, with the number of fur farms having dropped dramatically from more than 150 in 2013 to around a dozen in 2022 including two large mink farms producing approximately 100,000 mink pelts and 15,000 chinchilla pelts annually. The ban in Romania also tackles the environmental and human health hazards linked to fur farming, including the spread of zoonotic diseases, positioning Romania within the broader European movement that emphasizes animal welfare and sustainable practices.
Fur facts:
Tens of millions of animals suffer and die each year in the global fur trade, the majority reared in barren battery cages on fur farms.
Fur farming has now been banned in 22 European countries—the 16 Member States of Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia plus Bosnia and Herzegovina, Guernsey, Norway, United Kingdom, North Macedonia and Serbia. In addition, Switzerland and Germany have implemented strict regulations which have effectively ended fur farming and Denmark, Sweden and Hungary have imposed measures that have ended the farming of certain species. Political discussion of a ban is underway in Bulgaria and Sweden.
Mink on almost 500 fur farms across 13 countries in Europe and North America have been found to be infected with COVID-19, and Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) has been found on 72 fur farms (one in Spain, 71 in Finland) to date. Millions of mink, arctic fox, red fox, raccoon dogs and sable have been slaughtered on public health grounds.
Ten fashion brands in Romania have pledged to go fur-free after working with Humane Society International/Europe, and have become the first designers in Romania to join the global Fur Free Retailer Ioana Ciolacu, Muse um Concept, REDU, OCTAVIA CHIRU, Katerini, Hooldra, Feeric Fashion Week, Scapadona, Axente and Lenca join the almost 1,600 fashion brands, retailers and designers in 25 countries around the world that are part of the Fur Free Retailer program, including Gucci, Moncler, Prada, Adidas, H&M and Zara.
ENDS
View images/video are available here. To download these visuals, please contact commsromania@hsi.org
Labour MP Ruth Jones says UK legislation would ‘shut up shop on the cruel and unnecessary fur trade’
Humane Society International / United Kingdom
HSI
LONDON―A bill to ban UK fur imports and sales will be introduced to Parliament tomorrow by Ruth Jones, Labour MP for Newport West and Islwyn. The Fur Free Britain campaign, led by animal protection charity Humane Society International/UK, welcomed the tabling of this draft law as a significant step forward.
The bill proposes to extend existing bans on trade in fur from cats, dogs and seals to include foxes, raccoon dogs, mink, chinchilla, coyotes and other animals killed for fur fashion, and prevent the import and sale of new animal fur from all species. If passed into law, the ban would end the UK’s complicity in the cruelty of the global fur trade. HSI/UK estimates that the amount of fur imported into the UK over the five years 2019-2023 equates to approximately 7 million animals brutally killed.
Fur farming has been illegal across the UK since the Fur Farming (Prohibition) Acts were brought into force in 2003 under a Labour Government. Despite this, importing fur into the UK and selling it here is still allowed. Fur Free Britain campaigners are calling on the government to strongly back the new bill and finally put an end to this double standard.Their Fur Free Britain campaign is supported by a host of celebrities including Dame Judi Dench, Stella and Sir Paul McCartney, Leona Lewis OBE, Paloma Faith, Simon Pegg, Sue Perkins, Alesha Dixon, Kirsty Gallacher and Pete Wicks.
Ruth Jones MP said: “Footage of terrified foxes on fur farms breaks my heart and I can’t comprehend why anyone would inflict this kind of cruelty on an animal for a bit of frivolous fashion. I have heard about the issue from hundreds of my constituents in Newport West and Islwyn and I am delighted to introduce this Bill to reflect their concerns. It is about time we shut up shop on this cruel and unnecessary trade and a fur import ban would send a powerful message to the rest of the world.”
In a studypublished in Nature last month, scientists studying animals farmed for their fur in China identified 39 viruses classed as “potentially high-risk” for transmission to humans, including 13 novel viruses and 11 zoonotic viruses which can be transmitted from animals to humans. The paper’s authors warn that fur farms act as a hub for transmitting viruses. Top British virologists from Imperial College London’s Department of Infectious Disease have also warned that fur farms are a ticking time bomb for another pandemic and that farming mink for fur should be considered the same risk level as the bushmeat trade and live animal marketsdue to the threat it poses for the emergence of future disease outbreaks.
Claire Bass, Humane Society International/UK’s senior campaigns and public affairs director, said: “I’ve looked into the eyes of hundreds of animals on fur farms in Finland and these animals are broken souls, tormented their whole lives in tiny barren wire cages, often suffering agonizing untreated wounds and deformities. We know that millions of British people are disgusted by the fact that animals are suffering like this overseas to end up as a piece of fur trim sold here in the UK, so we are enormously grateful to Ruth Jones for introducing this extremely popular bill for a Fur Free Britain. We urge the Labour Government to back the ban.”
National polling carried out in April 2022 revealed that 77% of British citizens think the government should ban the importation of animal products such as fur, where the production methods are already banned in the UK. The Fur Free Britain campaign has so far gathered over 1.2 million petition signatures calling for a ban on the import and sale of fur in the UK. Most of the world’s major fashion-houses have already gone fur-free, including Chanel, Dolce & Gabbana, Saint Laurent, Valentino, Prada, Gucci, Versace, Alexander McQueen, Balenciaga and Armani.
Sonul Badiani-Hamment, UK country director of FOUR PAWS UK, Fur Free Britain coalition partner said: “Ruth Jones’ Private Member’s Bill presents a powerful opportunity for the Government to end our association with the cruel and high-risk fur trade once and for all. Over two decades have passed since fur farming was banned in the UK by the then Labour Government. Now this Bill presents them with an opportunity to fullyaddress our role in what is left of the cruel trade and stop importing and exporting cruelty for good. By implementing a nationwide ban on the import and sale of fur products, we can help save the lives of millions of animals who are needlessly killed for their fur, and Labour can start fulfilling their promise to deliver the biggest boost to animal welfare in a generation.”
Mark Glover, chair of the Labour Animal Welfare Society, said: “We are delighted to be working with Ruth Jones MP on this groundbreaking bill that would put an end to Britain’s role in the horrific suffering endured by animals on fur farms. By banning the import of fur products, Britain will no longer contribute to the unimaginable pain and torment that is needlessly inflicted on animals in the fur trade. The Labour government banned fur farming in the UK over 20 years ago as it offends public morality, and this bill would close the loophole that allows the importation of products that are illegal to produce here. We strongly urge the government to honour the public’s belief in the humane treatment of animals by supporting this bill.”
Recent reports by FOUR PAWS UKand HSI/UKset out the environmental impact of the fur industry and its links to environmental degradation. Harsh chemicals are used throughout the production of fur, including some that are hazardous and carcinogenic. The environmental impacts of mink, fox and raccoon dog fur production significantly exceed those of other materials used in fashion, including cotton and even polyester and acrylic used to make faux fur.A significant component of fur’s carbon footprint is the vast quantity of animal products fed to carnivorous animals on fur farms, and fur farms can also pollute local waterways with manure.
ENDS
Media contact: Sally Ivens, senior media manager, HSI/UK: sivens@hsi.org
Tens of millions of animals suffer and die each year in the global fur trade. The majority of animals killed for fur are reared in barren battery cages on fur farms.
HMRC records show that almost £40million of fur (£39,703,694) was imported to the UK in 2023 from countries including China, Finland, Spain, Greece and Poland.
In addition to the physical and psychological torment of being confined in small, barren cages for their entire lives, the killing methods typically used on fur farms are equally distressing. Mink are killed by gassing, foxes and raccoon dogs are killed by anal electrocution and investigations also show animals commonly bludgeoned to death on farms in China.
Wild animals like coyote and raccoons who are trapped for their fur, fare little better – they can languish in agony in cruel traps for hours or even days before dying from dehydration, starvation, attacks by predators or by being killed when the trapper returns. HSI’s 2022 joint undercover investigation into trapping in the US revealed shocking cruelty and animals suffering protracted and violent deaths. Report available here.
Mink on almost 500 fur farms across 13 countries have been infected with COVID-19 which can be transferred from humans to farmed mink, between mink and from farmed mink to humans. Further, around 500,000 foxes, mink, raccoon dogs and sable have been ordered killed on public health grounds after Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A (H5N1) was found on more than 70 fur farms in Spain and Finland.
The Conservative Government stated it would “explore potential action” on the fur issue under its May 2021 Action Plan for Animal Welfare. It launched a Call for Evidence which attracted around 30,000 responses, of which an FOI request revealed over 96% strongly agreed that it is wrong for animals to be killed for the sake of their fur. Its full findings are yet to be published. At a Westminster Hall Debate in June 2023, a Defra Minister confirmed the Animal Welfare Committee had been commissioned to produce a report, by end of 2024, on “the issue of responsible sourcing in the fur industry, including the animal welfare standards and safeguards that apply to fur imported into this country.” During the June 2023 debate, Labour’s shadow Defra minister, Alex Sobel MP, stated: “a Labour Government would take the necessary action on the importation of fur into Britain. We are committed to this. … A Labour Britain will be a compassionate, fur-free Britain.”
Zen Corporation Group becomes the largest Thai restaurant group in the country to embrace higher welfare standards for hens
Humane Society International / Southeast Asia
David Paul Morris
BANGKOK—Humane Society International in Thailand celebrates Zen Corporation Group for its commitment to use eggs from cage-free hens by 2028. With 11 restaurant brands and more than 240 outlets, Zen Corporation Group has become Thailand’s largest restaurant group to join the global cage-free movement. In 2024, the group already reached the 80% mark of its egg supply coming from cage-free hens, demonstrating its commitment to improving the lives of thousands of hens. By the 2028 deadline, all eggs used across Zen Corporation Group’s restaurants will come from hens kept in cage-free systems where they can engage in natural behaviors like perching and nesting.
This commitment is the result of close collaboration with Humane Society International, which began in 2023. HSI worked with Zen Corporation Group by providing expert guidance, facilitating key connections with local suppliers, organizing cage-free farm site visits, providing team training on the benefits of cage-free systems, and many other full supports on any related aspects of cage-free eggs policy.
In Thailand, where most of the country’s 95.8 million egg-laying hens are confined to tiny wire cages, Zen Corporation Group’s decision signals a major shift in the industry. By adopting a cage-free procurement policy, Zen Corporation Group is taking a critical step to reduce suffering and drive a change in the market. In a cage-free environment, hens can move more freely, perch, nest, and dustbathe, leading to significantly improved welfare and better lives.
“The group has been driven by strong passion of professional and expertise to develop creative menu and unique dining experience with love not only to the customers but every life related to us. Responsible consumption in our supply chain involving animal welfare is an essential element for our corporate social responsibility goals and sustainable development. Thus, cage-free eggs are one of the main programs we would like to move forward to successful implementation soon. This action is one of our goals to support local producers for sustainable business”, said Miss. Jomkwan Chirathivat, General Manager, Sustainable Development of Zen Corporation Group.
“Zen Corporation Group’s leadership will have a lasting impact on both the welfare of animals and the expectations of consumers in Thailand. As one of the largest Thai companies to adopt a cage-free policy, the team has dedicated time, shown the will and worked diligently to begin implementing these higher welfare standards. Thanks to their hard work, countless hens will have the space to spread their wings and a better life”, said Lalada Tangjerdjaras, Thailand Program Manager, Farm Animal Welfare and Protection for Humane Society International.
Zen Corporation Group’s commitment is part of a national and global trend moving away from keeping hens in cages in egg production. It joins nearly 80 other national and multinational companies in Thailand such as AccorHotels, Hilton Hotels and Resorts, Sodexo, Nestlé and Mondelēz International that are all committed to only supplying cage-free eggs. As consumer demand for more ethical and sustainable food options increases, companies like Zen Corporation Group are leading the charge for positive change.
ENDS
Media contact: Lalada Tangjerdjaras, Thailand program manager for farm animal welfare and protection at Humane Society International, ltangjerdjaras@hsi.org
Akiyoshi, Rena Bakery, Rotruedee, and Tap Home Cook make the switch to cage-free eggs for a more humane future
Humane Society International / Southeast Asia
Tigrane Hogbossia
BANGKOK, Thailand—This World Egg Day, four beloved Thai restaurants are putting animal welfare first by celebrating World Hen Day instead. Akiyoshi, Rena Bakery, Rotruedee, and Tap Home Cook are proudly announcing their transition to using only cage-free eggs and ensuring that the hens who lay those eggs are treated with greater care and have room to move.
In collaboration with Humane Society International, these popular establishments are leading the way in Thailand’s shift toward more compassionate food choices. Japanese restaurant Akiyoshi, authentic Thai fusion western style Rena Bakery, renowned Thai restaurant Rotruedee and Tap Home Cook, famous for its home-style cooking, are all committing to a cage-free egg supply. This means hens will no longer be confined to cramped cages, and instead will have space to spread their wings, walk, and engage in natural behaviors like dustbathing and perching.
In Thailand, approximately 96.3 million hens are used for egg production, and the majority are confined in small wire cages so small that hens can’t spread their wings or take more than a few steps. In contrast, “World Hen Day is an opportunity to shine a light on the importance of animal welfare and make the point clearly that hens are individuals deserving of basic protections,” said Lalada Tangjerdjaras, Thailand Program Manager for Farm Animal Welfare and Protection at Humane Society International. “Thai consumers, like others around the world, care about animal welfare, and they support companies that share these values. We’re thrilled to work with companies that adopted cage-free policies and are advancing the movement toward cage-free egg production.
These four companies are responding to growing consumer demand for more ethical food choices. For them, the decision to go cage-free isn’t just about business—it’s about doing what’s right.
“Switching to using 100% cage-free eggs is an important decision for us because it fits with who we are and is what our customers want.” said a spokesperson for the Executive Management team at Akiyoshi.
Mr. Chatchai Komintr, CEO of Rena Bakery added: “After we learned more about how caged hens live, we decided that we needed to do something to help.”
These four businesses join over 50 companies in Thailand, including big names like Minor Foods and Marriott, that have pledged to use exclusively cage-free eggs. Other Thailand brands are also part of this growing shift toward more humane sourcing. Globally, more than 2,000 companies—including Burger King, Bimbo, and Accor—have committed to go cage-free.
The move to cage-free eggs reflects a broader shift toward ethical choices, as more Thai consumers seek out businesses that prioritize animal welfare, and make their preferences known. This is a step toward a brighter, more compassionate future for Thailand’s hens.
ENDS
Media contact: Lalada Tangjerdjaras, Thailand program manager for farm animal welfare and protection at Humane Society International, ltangjerdjaras@hsi.org
Her powerful images of animal parts support efforts to pressure policymakers to strengthen protections for endangered species and ban hunting trophy imports
Jaschinski’s award-winning photo shows a new magnetic powder being applied to a confiscated elephant tusk. The technique can retrieve fingerprints up to 28 days after poachers handle the tusk, overcoming challenges posed by ivory’s porous nature. Over 200 kits of this powder have been distributed to border forces in Africa and Asia, aiding in cases involving trafficked ivory, tiger claws and rhino horn. The method is valued for its simplicity and effectiveness where DNA techniques cannot be used.
“Whether it is for trophies or to feed the demand for ivory, figures reveal that we are on track to wipe out one of the most iconic species by 2040.” says Britta Jaschinski. “Losing our beautiful elephants in the name of sport, power and greed is simply not acceptable. Lifting fingerprints of ivory and other confiscated wildlife is an important technique in the forensic tool kit and brings hope that we can disrupt and even dismantle entire trade chains. If we can’t save our most charismatic species, what hope is there for others? I am grateful to organisations like Humane Society International/Europe for amplifying these issues and for pushing for real political action to strengthen wildlife protection and in particular right now, to end the import of hunting trophies.”
HSI/Europe admires Jaschinski’s powerful work and has collaborated with her on the Still Life. Delivered– The macabre business of trophy hunting exhibition, which is part of the #NotInMyWorld campaign of the organization. The campaign highlights trophy hunting—the legal and senseless killing of iconic wild animals for sport which has severe environmental, ethical, social and economic impacts. Endangered species such as the hippopotamus, African elephant, African lion, leopard, brown bear and polar bear, turned into lifeless objects—from bottle openers to ashtrays—rendered as such by the barrel of a gun and immortalized by the lens of the camera. HSI/Europe’s campaign calls on the EU and its Member States to ban hunting trophy imports and urges businesses to stop supporting this practice. The Still Life. Delivered exhibition has appeared in Rome and Warsaw, with plans to travel to other cities to spotlight these works that expose how majestic living animals are killed by trophy hunters and turned into grim lifeless objects for mere personal satisfaction.
Through her work, the London-based photographer explores the human-nature relationship and its implications. Known for her distinctive style, she documents wildlife crimes and collaborates with international authorities and environmental organizations. As co-founder of Photographers Against Wildlife Crime™ and creator of The Evidence Project, she advocates for public awareness and political action to protect wildlife and natural habitats.
Ruud Tombrock, HSI/Europe executive director, congratulates Jaschinski on her award and emphasizes the urgency of political intervention: “Britta Jaschinski’s powerful images reveal the brutal reality behind trophy hunting and the immense suffering and exploitation of animals it involves and send a strong message to European policymakers to take decisive action to stop the import of these grotesque trophies. This is not just about protecting individual animals but preserving ecosystems and safeguarding the future of endangered species worldwide.”
Between 2013 and 2022, the European Union imported over 27,000 trophies from animals threatened by trade and listed under CITES (the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species), making the EU the second-largest importer of hunting trophies after the United States. Among the species targeted are iconic animals such as hippos, rhinos, lions and polar bears.
Globally, there has been a strong movement away from the trophy hunting industry. Many countries, such as Colombia, Costa Rica, India, Kenya, Singapore, South Sudan and others already prohibit trophy hunting and/or trade in full or to a significant degree, while others, such as Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Finland, France, the Netherlands, the United States and others have some level of national trade restrictions for hunting trophies beyond CITES’ minimum requirements. Private industry has also emerged as a global leader in environmental sustainability and responsibility, with 45 transport companies prohibiting the transport of some or all hunting trophies on their carriers, including airlines from the world’s top five and EU’s top three largest airline groups.
Media contact: Eva-Maria Heinen, senior manager media and communications, HSI/Europe, emheinen@hsi.org; tel: +39 333 8608589
Humane Society International / Europe
Raimund Linke/Getty Images
BRUSSELS—European Union Member States have agreed by majority to support the European Commission’s proposal to reduce the protection status of wolves under the Bern Convention. Humane Society International/Europe believes this regrettable move paves the way for wolf culling as a response to farmed animal depredation and undermines Europe’s efforts to protect and restore biodiversity. It also ignores the call by hundreds of thousands of citizens and organizations for the EU to step up human-wildlife coexistence efforts.
Dr. Joanna Swabe, HSI/Europe’s senior director of public affairs, said:
“We are bitterly disappointed by the decision of Member States to lower the protection status of wolves. While we understand the concerns of local communities, it is important to prioritise evidence-based approaches when managing wildlife.
Although wolves have made a remarkable recovery in parts of Europe, largely due to legal protection measures, the latest assessment by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources found that six out of nine transboundary wolf populations remain vulnerable or near threatened. So, it’s clear that these large carnivores have yet to reach a favorable conservation status across the entire EU.
Reducing wolf protections at this stage, without solid scientific support, just to placate the farming and hunting lobbies, will jeopardise the progress made in restoring wolf populations and—if the Bern Convention is amended—will open the door to further weakening of protections for wolves under the EU’s Habitat Directive. Instead of focusing on lethal control, more concentrated efforts should be directed toward promoting coexistence with wolves. Proven measures such as better strategies to protect farmed animals can address concerns over wolf depredation more effectively than weakening the protections of large carnivores. We believe that fostering this kind of coexistence is the best path forward for both humans and wildlife.”
Facts about wolves in the EU:
Wolves play a crucial role in maintaining healthy ecosystems and supporting biodiversity across Europe and are granted strict protection under both the Bern Convention and the EU Habitats Directive.
Wolves are present in 24 of the EU Member States and their total population in the EU amounts to 20,000 individuals. However, the most recent assessments done under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive demonstrates that in six out of seven biogeographical regions in the EU their populations are in unfavorable or inadequate conservation status. Wolf recovery is still in progress and the primary objectives of the Bern Convention and Habitats Directive—restoring endangered species—have yet to be fully achieved.
The Commission’s own detailed analysis shows no proof that culling effectively reduces depredation of farmed animals.
Last week, a joint statement by more than 300 civil organizations, including HSI/Europe, was presented to decision makers, calling on EU Member States to reject the European Commission’s proposal to weaken the protection status of wolves under the Bern Convention and instead intensify efforts to achieve coexistence with large carnivores.
An online petition urging EU Member State Environment Ministers to uphold the current conservation status of wolves and prioritize preventive measures to protect farmed animals from attacks has gathered more than 300,000 signatures to date.
A survey, conducted in November 2023 in the rural areas of 10 member states, where local communities coexist with large carnivores, showed that 68% of participants support the strict protection status of large carnivores (including 61% of sheep farmers) and 75% claim that farmers should implement available measures to protect their animals from large carnivores. The vast majority of respondents believe that killing of problematic individual carnivores should be a last resort, when protective measures have failed and 69% insist that decisions on the management of wolves and other large carnivores should also consider the benefits and functions these animals provide.
ENDS
Media contact: Yavor Gechev: +359889468098; ygechev@hsi.org
Humane Society International / Latin America
Jeremy Sutton-Hibbert/Alamy
LIMA, Peru—Attempts to bring back commercial whaling both directly and under the guise of food security have both failed at the 69th International Whaling Commission meeting in Peru this week, to the relief of animal protection and conservation non-profits including Humane Society International.
The draft resolution on food security had been submitted by the Republic of Guinea and co-sponsored by Cambodia, Ivory Coast, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Republic of Congo, Senegal and St. Kitts and Nevis, close allies of Japan which has sought to scrap the moratorium since it was first adopted in 1982. However, realising that they would have lost if put to a vote, the proponents withdraw it instead. They will work on it intersessionally before the next IWC meeting in Australia in 2026.
Dr Madison Miketa, wildlife scientist at Humane Society International, said: “While we are glad this proposal has been withdrawn, we don’t believe it should return in the future because the IWC is not the appropriate venue for addressing food security concerns. This proposal was never about food security; the nations that put forward this proposal have no history or cultural traditions of eating whale meat. In fact, 110 signatories from West and Central Africa (the region of the majority of proponents of this proposal) condemned the proposal and state that whale meat consumption doesn’t contribute to food security in their region. This proposal was about being a good ally to pro-whaling Japan which has continually attempted to erode the ban on commercial whaling.
“Whales are worth far more alive than dead and are critically important for healthy, productive oceans. For communities reliant on eco-tourism and whale watching income, or those dependent on healthy fish stocks, the presence of abundant whale populations is a lifeline. Furthermore, killing these long-lived, slow reproducing animals who are also impacted by myriad human-caused threats such as climate change, pollution and fisheries bycatch, would do nothing to ameliorate food insecurity. Not to mention that whale meat and blubber are often contaminated with high levels of pollutants and heavy metals such as mercury and PCBs, making them unsafe for human consumption.”
Since the ban on commercial whaling was implemented in 1986, the majority of nations that were previously engaged in commercial whaling have successfully transitioned to whale watching, which depends on healthy whale populations. Not only have they not suffered economic or nutritional distress as a result, but protecting whales, rather than killing them, delivers far better economic, social and environmental benefits to local communities.
Also withdrawn was a proposal aimed at undermining the more than 40-year-old ban on commercial whale killing. The draft resolution had been submitted by Antigua and Barbuda and co-sponsored by St. Lucia, close allies of Japan which has sought to scrap the moratorium since it was first adopted in 1982. These two countries supported Japan’s pro-whaling agenda when it was an IWC member, and although Japan withdrew from the IWC in 2019, it continues to project its pro-whaling influence via its allies.
Grettel Delgadillo, deputy director of Humane Society International/Latin America says: “We are relieved that the dark and dangerous resolution to resume commercial whaling was withdrawn and can no longer take up precious time here at IWC. Lead proponents Antigua & Barbuda with the support of St Lucia, chose withdrawal over inevitable defeat on the floor once they realised the majority of nations gathered would not support their attempts to dismantle the global moratorium. But for this twin-nation state to so persistently pursue a pro-whaling agenda despite having no dietary, cultural, economic or historical connection with whaling or whale meat, demonstrates how Japan continues to influence IWC despite no longer being a member. The global moratorium on whaling has spared the lives of hundreds of thousands of cetaceans and been instrumental in pulling many species back from the brink of extinction. Commercial whaling is unethical, unsustainable and unnecessary. Whales face myriad threats from commercial hunting, fisheries bycatch, noise and plastic pollution, ship strikes and the urgent climate crisis. They need the moratorium and the IWC now more than ever.”
HSI’s whale experts at the IWC meeting are available for interviews.
ENDS
Media contact: Wendy Higgins, Director of International Media, whiggins@hsi.org
Humane Society International / Latin America
Vanessa Mignon
LIMA, Peru—Delegates from Humane Society International attending the 69th International Whaling Commission meeting in Peru, expressed bitter disappointment today that pro-whaling nations have once again voted against the creation of a whale sanctuary in the South Atlantic. The votes were 40 in favour, 14 opposed with 3 abstentions, therefore failing by just one or two votes to achieve the three quarters majority needed.
The proposal by Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay has been put forward at successive IWC meetings for the past 26 years—it was first proposed in 1998 by the government of Brazil, during the 50th IWC meeting held in Oman. If successful, the sanctuary would have would have banned any commercial hunting of cetaceans within its waters, extending from the East coasts of Uruguay, Brazil, and Argentina across to Western Africa and abutting the Southern Ocean Sanctuary that was established in 1994.
Grettel Delgadillo, deputy director of Humane Society International/Latin America, said: “It’s a bitter disappointment that the proposal for a South Atlantic whale sanctuary has yet again been narrowly defeated by nations with a vested interest in killing whales for profit. There was no legitimate reason to block this proposal except for vain self-interest. For the past 26 years, nations in the region have battled to create a safe haven sanctuary in their waters for whales who face continued threats from commercial whaling, entanglement in fishing gear, marine pollution, ship strikes and climate change. Some whale populations are also still struggling to recover following decades of commercial whaling in the twentieth century. It is a tragedy that once again the whales have lost the chance of a protection they need more than ever.”
Almost half of the world’s known species, subspecies and subpopulations of cetaceans, are listed as Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable. Species such as humpbacks, southern right whales and more inhabit the southern Atlantic, and these populations are still recovering from decimation due to intensive commercial whaling of previous centuries. It is crucial that the sanctuary is established to ensure that these whale species recover and thrive.
Despite this setback, whale-friendly nations voted by a resounding majority to accept a resolution proposal to reaffirm the global ban on commercial whale killing. The draft resolution was submitted by the European Union with 37 yes votes, 12 no votes and 8 abstentions.
Delgadillo said: “The EU tabled this compassionate and conservation-minded proposal to remind countries of their legal obligations pertaining to commercial whaling. Considering the persistent attempts by pro-whaling nations to dismantle the 40-year-old ban, the message behind this proposal is much needed. Thanks to the moratorium, the lives of hundreds of thousands of whales will have been saved and many species brought back from the brink of extinction. Commercial whaling is unethical, unsustainable and unnecessary so we welcome the passing of this proposal as a signal to all nations that the world must continue to save the whales.”
The global moratorium on commercial whaling was agreed to in 1982 and implemented from 1986 onwards because the high number of whales being killed was threatening the survival of whale populations. The moratorium is widely considered to be one of the most major conservation successes of our time. It has likely prevented the killing of tens or even hundreds of thousands of whales, blocked the expansion of commercial whaling for decades and allowed some whale populations to recover from cruel and unsustainable mass slaughter.
ENDS
Media contact: Wendy Higgins, Director of International Media, whiggins@hsi.org
Humane Society International / South Korea
HSI
SEOUL—As South Korea’s government today published its much-anticipated Basic Plan for the phase out of the dog meat industry, animal campaigners at Humane Society International/Korea have welcomed it as an “important milestone in this historic plan” and called on other countries across Asia to follow suit. However, more action is needed to prevent unnecessary dog suffering, says HSI/Korea.
Sangkyung Lee, HSI/Korea’s end dog meat campaign manager, made the following statement:
“Publication of the government’s Basic Plan to phase out South Korea’s dog meat industry marks an important milestone in this historic ban that will see it through to completion and end our country’s dog meat era for good. We hope that other countries across Asia where the dog meat trade persists despite public opposition will follow South Korea’s lead so that our Special Act and Basic Plan can be the catalyst for similar compassionate action around the world. HSI/Korea stands ready to further advise the government on dog welfare, and to rescue dogs where we can so that innocent victims of this brutal dog meat industry have a chance of a happy life.”
Regarding the financial support plan for dog meat farmers, HSI/Korea’s Lee said: “We are disappointed that the government’s Basic Plan provides financial support for dog farms based on the number of dogs. While limits are set based on the reported capacity of waste disposal facilities, this approach risks potentially increasing dog breeding with the aim of getting more money from the scheme, with more puppies being born into suffering. This completely goes against the purpose of the special law, risks subjecting even more dogs to unnecessary suffering and could actually make the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs’ job of dog farm population management even harder in the long-term. We urge MAFRA to rethink this idea and switch instead to a fixed financial amount or support package based on each farmer’s transition business plan.”
On the issue of managing the remaining dogs during and after the phase-out period, Lee added: “More urgent discussions are clearly needed about practical steps that must be prioritized to stop puppies being born on farms during the phase out period. The government must actively engage with local governments and animal protection groups like HSI/Korea, to ensure that farmers immediately separate male and female dogs on farms to stop breeding. There is no excuse for even more innocent puppies to be born into this cruel industry precisely at a time when the goal is to end it.”
Facts:
With over 6 million pet dogs now living in Korean homes, demand for dog meat is at an all-time low. A 2023 Nielsen Korea opinion polls shows that 86% of South Koreans won’t eat dog meat in the future and 57% support a ban.
Since 2015, HSI/Korea has helped 18 dog farmers across South Korea switch to growing crops such as chili plants and parsley, or water delivery and other livelihoods as part of its Models for Change program.
South Korea joins a growing list of governments across Asia that have banned the dog meat trade (with varying degrees of enforcement) including Hong Kong, Taiwan, the Philippines, India, Thailand and Singapore, as well as the cities of Shenzhen and Zhuhai in mainland China, Siem Reap province in Cambodia, and more than 60 cities, regencies and provinces in Indonesia.
Click here to view video and photos of HSI/Korea’s dog meat farm closure program. Contact whiggins@hsi.org to download visuals.
